PANG ranks 3rd and BNMC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BNMC vs PANG
BNMC −0.31pt a year
0.45%0.76%
PANG 72.1×the volume
61944.6K
BNMC vs PANG Performance
+14.3%+7.0%
- BNMC 0.45%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- BNMC $1M
- PANG $9M
- BNMC
- PANG +91.6%
- BNMC 1
- PANG 4
- BNMC 619 sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- BNMC $37.11
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNMC | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | F13 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F21 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BNMC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNMCC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNMC vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNMC vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs BNMC
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNMC 0.45%
$9,041
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNMC | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,353 | $541 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,142 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,656 | $5,615 |
- 0.45%BNMC, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
BNMC 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BNMC vs PANG Dividends
- BNMC None
- PANG
- BNMC
- PANG $1.30
- BNMC
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BNMC
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BNMC
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BNMC vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNMC PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNMC PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BNMC PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BNMC 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.