COTG ranks 3rd and BOEG 21st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BOEG vs COTG
12.4%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.77%0.77%
COTG 1.02×the volume
95.2K97.2K
BOEG vs COTG Performance
−38.0%+16.3%
- BOEG 0.77%
- COTG 0.77%
- BOEG $9M
- COTG $9M
- BOEG −38.0%
- COTG +16.3%, better
- BOEG 4
- COTG 4
- BOEG 95.2K sh
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- BOEG $7.85
- COTG $15.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BOEG | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | B61 |
| Mission | A83 | A95Higher |
| Risk | B69 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B68 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | B56 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BOEG and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BOEGB
COTGA
In short
BOEG Most single-stock leveraged ETFs point at chips and AI. BOEG aims at Boeing instead: 200% of BA's daily move, reset every trading day, at a standing 0.77% with no fee waiver in the mix.
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
BOEG The fund seeks daily results equal to 200% (2x) of the daily performance of Boeing Company stock (BA), before fees and expenses.
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BOEG vs COTG Holdings
How BOEG and COTG differ
12.4%
Shared holdings make up 16.4% of BOEG and 12.4% of COTG.
About this figure: BOEG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings12.4%
Sector
No Sector split for BOEG and COTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BOEGMore in COTG | Gap | BOEG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BOEG216.3%
- COTG212.3%
- BOEG2
- COTG1
Asset class
- BOEG
- Stocks
- COTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in BOEG1
- In both1
- Only in COTG0
Only in BOEG
1 security, 27.5% of BOEG by weight
- The Boeing Company - L - Cantor27.55%
Only in COTG
0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BOEGMore in COTG | Gap | BOEG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | BOEG +3.99 points | 16.35% | 12.36% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BOEG vs COTG Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,829
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BOEG 0.77%
$14,829
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BOEG | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,371 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,205 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,829 |
- 0.77%BOEG
- 0.77%COTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
BOEG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
BOEG vs COTG Dividends
- BOEG None
- COTG None
Distribution history
BOEG vs COTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BOEG 59.5%COTG 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BOEG −0.68COTG 0.12
- Worst fall
- BOEG −63.7%COTG −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BOEG 2.67COTG −0.04
BOEG and COTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
