Skip to content

BOTT vs BULD

Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF

BOTTBNasdaq

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF

BULDBNasdaq

Overlap

1.2%by weight

Expense ratio

BOTT −0.14pt a year

BOTT0.35%BULD0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BOTT 2.8×the volume

BOTT18.6KBULD6.62K

BOTT vs BULD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−16.8%BOTT+21.5%BULD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BOTT −16.8%. BULD +21.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BOTT 0.35%, better
BULD 0.49%
Fund size
BOTT $56M
BULD $9M
1Y total return
BOTT −16.8%
BULD +21.5%, better
Yield (12M)
BOTT 0.16%
BULD 0.90%, better
Holdings
BOTT 39
BULD 63
Avg volume (30D)
BOTT 18.6K sh, better
BULD 6.62K sh
NAV per share
BOTT $35.49
BULD $33.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BOTT: Cost 97, Risk 17, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 60, Durability 37. BULD: Cost 65, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 41, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for BOTT, BULD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBOTTBULD
Cost30% weightA97HigherB65
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF17B61Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B55Higher
Holdings10% weightB60HigherC41
Durability5% weightD37C48Higher

Rank among Robotics & Automation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BOTT and BULD are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Robotics & Automation⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

BOTT ranks 5th and BULD 7th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.

  1. Rank 3BWDRNWisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones FundScore 62
  2. Rank 5BBOTTThemes Humanoid Robotics ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 6BIQMFranklin Intelligent Machines ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 7BBULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 8CBOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BOTTBThemes Humanoid Robotics ETF

BULDBPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF

In short

BOTT Most robotics funds buy the whole factory floor. BOTT buys the androids: about 30 global names across the humanoid and service robot value chain, at 0.35% a year.

BULD Most robotics funds stop at the robots. BULD's index keeps going up the line to 3D printing and computer-aided design, the software that draws the part before a machine builds it. Rules-based, global, roughly 60 names, 0.49%.

Stated mandate

BOTT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies deriving significant revenue from designing and developing humanoid and service robots.

BULD The fund uses a rules-based approach to provide exposure to globally listed companies and depositary receipts focused on robotics and manufacturing automation, 3D printing, or computer-aided design. It seeks to track the BlueStar Robotics and 3D Printing Index.

Why people hold it

  • BOTT At 0.35% it undercuts the typical robotics and automation ETF (median 0.65%) and every peer ranked above it: IBOT at 0.47%, FBOT and FDIF at 0.50%.
  • A true pure play. Its index, the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, targets companies building humanoid and service robots, not the broad factory automation basket.themesetfs.com
  • Global mandate, about 30 names. Tight enough that the humanoid theme actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting buried under mega-cap ballast.themesetfs.com
  • Sits in the upper half of its robotics and automation peer group, one of the stronger builds of a very young theme.
  • BULD The mandate reaches past robots. The index covers robotics and manufacturing automation, 3D printing and computer-aided design, held through globally listed shares and depositary receipts.paceretfs.com
  • Fee is 0.49%, under the median for its robotics and automation peer group. A couple of rivals go lower: BOTT at 0.35%, IBOT at 0.47%.
  • Passive and rules-based. The BlueStar Robotics and 3D Printing Index sets the roughly 60 holdings, so the recipe is published rather than left to a manager's discretion.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2022 and sits in the upper half of its robotics and automation cohort in our review.

Worth knowing

  • BOTT Lightly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and bigger orders need more care at the point of trade.
  • Short file: the fund launched in 2024 and Themes relaunched it with the humanoid focus in 2025, so there is little live history to judge.globenewswire.com
  • About 30 stocks in one early-stage theme is concentrated, swingy exposure, and cash comes back to you once or twice a year at most.
  • BULD Small asset base and light trading. Bid/ask spreads can cost more than the headline fee on a given trade, especially in size.
  • Roughly 60 stocks in one industrial theme, listed around the world, so moves in a narrow slice of the market and in foreign currencies show up directly.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually. This is a theme wrapper, not a cash-flow one.

Full BOTT profile⁠

Full BULD profile⁠

BOTT vs BULD Holdings

As of

How BOTT and BULD differ

Overlap by weight

1.2%

Shared holdings make up 8.4% of BOTT and 1.2% of BULD.

Level by level

  • Holdings2 in both1.2%
  • Countryby domicile31.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for BULD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BOTT and BULD, widest gap first
CountryMore in BOTTMore in BULD
ChinaBOTT +43.9 points
United StatesBULD +32.7 points
South KoreaBOTT +22.2 points
NetherlandsBULD +9.2 points
FranceBULD +8.4 points
JapanBULD +5.7 points
IsraelBULD +4.1 points
GermanyBULD +3.2 points
Other countries (6)BULD +2.7 points

Outside the US: BOTT 12% developed, 88% emerging. BULD 89% developed, 11% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BOTT50.6%
  • BULD64.7%

Securities held

  • BOTT39
  • BULD60

Asset class

BOTT
Equity
BULD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BOTT37
  • In both2
  • Only in BULD58

Only in BOTT

37 securities, 91.7% of BOTT by weight

  • Ningbo PIA Automation Holding Corp5.78%
  • Tesla Inc5.67%
  • NVIDIA Corp5.60%

Only in BULD

58 securities, 98.7% of BULD by weight

  • Proto Labs Inc9.58%
  • Autodesk Inc8.74%
  • Dassault Systemes SE7.86%

Weight gaps

All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BOTT and BULD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BOTTMore in BULD
UBTech Robotics Corp LtdBOTT +3.88 points
Teradyne IncTERBOTT +3.25 points

All 31 BOTT holdings⁠All 65 BULD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BOTT vs BULD Cost

Overpaying BULD vs BOTT

$2,666

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BOTT 0.35%

    $7,126

  • BULD 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BOTT 0.35%
  • BULD 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530BULD $9,792BOTT $7,126

Year by year

YearBOTTBULDOverpaying
10$634$883$249
20$2,454$3,394$940
30$7,126$9,792$2,666

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%BOTT, cheaper
  • 0.49%BULD
  • Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
  • Median 0.54%

BOTT cheapest of 18 funds

BULD 5th cheapest of 18 funds

BOTT vs BULD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BOTT 0.16%
BULD 0.90%, better
Payout (12M)
BOTT $0.06
BULD $0.30
Last payment
BOTT $0.06
BULD $0.30
Ex-dividend
BOTT Dec 18, 2025
BULD Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
BOTT Dec 19, 2025
BULD Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
BOTT Irregular
BULD Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

BOTTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BOTT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.48; Dec 18, 2025 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
BULDTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll BULD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2022 $0.01; Jun 22, 2023 $0.04; Dec 27, 2023 $0.0089; Jun 27, 2024 $0.03; Dec 27, 2024 $0.01; Jun 5, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BOTT vs BULD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BOTT 36.2%since May 2024BULD 24.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BOTT 0.43since May 2024BULD 0.81
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BOTT −44.3%since Apr 2024BULD −27.6%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BOTT 1.60BULD 1.63

BOTT and BULD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BOTTBvsIBOTA

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BULDBvsIBOTA

    Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BOTTBvsFBOTB

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BULDBvsFBOTB

    Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BOTTBvsFDIFB

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · Fidelity Disruptors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BULDBvsFDIFB

    Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF · Fidelity Disruptors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.