FBOT ranks 2nd and BULD 7th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
BULD vs FBOT
BULD −0.01pt a year
0.49%0.50%
FBOT 2.1×the volume
6.62K13.9K
BULD +2.7pt
+23.9%+21.2%
BULD vs FBOT Performance
+21.5%+8.4%
- BULD 0.49%, better
- FBOT 0.50%
- BULD $9M
- FBOT $213M
- BULD +21.5%, better
- FBOT +8.4%
- BULD 0.90%, better
- FBOT 0.42%
- BULD 63
- FBOT 53
- BULD 6.62K sh
- FBOT 13.9K sh, better
- BULD $33.28
- FBOT $37.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BULD | FBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | C41 | A75Higher |
| Durability | C48 | A84Higher |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. BULD and FBOT are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BULDB
FBOTB
In short
BULD Most robotics funds stop at the robots. BULD's index keeps going up the line to 3D printing and computer-aided design, the software that draws the part before a machine builds it. Rules-based, global, roughly 60 names, 0.49%.
FBOT Most robotics funds hand the job to an index. FBOT hands it to Fidelity's analysts: about 50 global picks spanning industrial robots, machine vision, autonomous driving and 3D printing, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
BULD The fund uses a rules-based approach to provide exposure to globally listed companies and depositary receipts focused on robotics and manufacturing automation, 3D printing, or computer-aided design. It seeks to track the BlueStar Robotics and 3D Printing Index.
FBOT The fund seeks long-term capital growth by normally investing at least 80% of its assets in securities of disruptive automation companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BULD vs FBOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BULD vs FBOT Cost
Overpaying FBOT vs BULD
$187
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BULD 0.49%
$9,792
FBOT 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BULD | FBOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $900 | $17 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $3,460 | $66 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $9,979 | $187 |
- 0.49%BULD, cheaper
- 0.50%FBOT
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
BULD 5th cheapest of 18 funds
FBOT 7th cheapest of 18 funds
BULD vs FBOT Dividends
- BULD 0.90%, better
- FBOT 0.42%
- BULD $0.30
- FBOT $0.16
- BULD $0.30
- FBOT $0.03
- BULD Dec 30, 2025
- FBOT Sep 18, 2026
- BULD Jan 5, 2026
- FBOT Sep 22, 2026
- BULD Twice a year
- FBOT Twice a year
Distribution history
BULD vs FBOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BULD 24.9%FBOT 18.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BULD 0.81FBOT 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- BULD −27.6%FBOT −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BULD 1.63FBOT 1.30
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.