ONOF ranks 3rd and BOUT 18th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
BOUT vs ONOF
ONOF −0.41pt a year
0.80%0.39%
ONOF 2.5×the volume
2.27K5.67K
ONOF +5.3pt
+1.6%+6.9%
BOUT vs ONOF Performance
+8.0%+39.5%
- BOUT 0.80%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- BOUT $14M
- ONOF $136M
- BOUT +7.9%
- ONOF +9.2%, better
- BOUT 0.31%
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- BOUT 26
- ONOF 506
- BOUT 2.27K sh
- ONOF 5.67K sh, better
- BOUT $38.78
- ONOF $39.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BOUT | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F18 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | A72Higher |
| Durability | D37 | B56Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. BOUT and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BOUTD
ONOFA
In short
BOUT An index fund for the chart-watching crowd: BOUT follows the IBD Breakout Stocks Index, a roughly 50-stock growth screen drawn from Investor's Business Daily's Composite Ranking, wrapped in a plain vanilla ETF.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
BOUT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the IBD Breakout Stocks Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in the Index’s equity securities and generally holds them in index weights.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BOUT vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BOUT vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying BOUT vs ONOF
$7,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BOUT 0.80%
$15,346
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BOUT | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $705 | $717 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $2,725 | $2,668 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $7,898 | $7,448 |
- 0.80%BOUT
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
BOUT 14th cheapest of 20 funds
BOUT vs ONOF Dividends
- BOUT 0.31%
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- BOUT $0.12
- ONOF $0.49
- BOUT $0.12
- ONOF $0.16
- BOUT Dec 31, 2025
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- BOUT Jan 2, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- BOUT Annual
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
BOUT vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BOUT
- ONOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BOUT 18.6%ONOF 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BOUT 0.49ONOF 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- BOUT −28.3%ONOF −26.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BOUT 1.05ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.