ONOF ranks 3rd and PTMC 4th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ONOF vs PTMC
ONOF −0.21pt a year
0.39%0.60%
PTMC 3.1×the volume
5.82K17.9K
ONOF +4.4pt
+7.4%+3.0%
ONOF vs PTMC Performance
+42.6%+15.9%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- PTMC 0.60%
- ONOF $140M
- PTMC $370M
- ONOF +7.7%
- PTMC +13.7%, better
- ONOF 1.22%
- PTMC 1.65%, better
- ONOF 504
- PTMC 402
- ONOF 5.82K sh
- PTMC 17.9K sh, better
- ONOF $40.37
- PTMC $39.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONOF | PTMC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A71 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | B59 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ONOF and PTMC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONOFA
PTMCA
In short
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
PTMC A mid-cap index fund with a seatbelt built in. PTMC tracks a rules-based trend index that shifts the portfolio between roughly 400 US mid-cap stocks and defensive positioning, with no manager judgment in the loop. Running since 2015.
Stated mandate
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
PTMC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONOF vs PTMC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONOF vs PTMC Cost
Overpaying PTMC vs ONOF
$3,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
PTMC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONOF | PTMC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,076 | $371 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,116 | $1,391 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,817 | $3,919 |
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- 0.60%PTMC
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
PTMC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
ONOF vs PTMC Dividends
- ONOF 1.22%
- PTMC 1.65%, better
- ONOF $0.49
- PTMC $0.66
- ONOF $0.16
- PTMC $0.66
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- PTMC Dec 30, 2025
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- PTMC Jan 5, 2026
- ONOF Twice a year
- PTMC Annual
Distribution history
ONOF vs PTMC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ONOF
- PTMC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONOF 12.0%, betterPTMC 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ONOF 0.82, betterPTMC 0.48
- Worst fall
- ONOF −26.2%PTMC −16.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ONOF 0.96PTMC 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.42%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.42%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.