IBHG ranks 3rd and BSJS 13th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJS vs IBHG
IBHG −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
BSJS 1.1×the volume
142K127K
IBHG +0.5pt
+3.2%+3.7%
BSJS vs IBHG Performance
+17.3%+19.8%
- BSJS 0.42%
- IBHG 0.35%, better
- BSJS $779M
- IBHG $532M
- BSJS +4.0%, better
- IBHG +2.9%
- BSJS 6.09%, better
- IBHG 5.90%
- BSJS 160
- IBHG 395
- BSJS 142K sh, better
- IBHG 127K sh
- BSJS $21.47
- IBHG $21.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJS | IBHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B64 | B64 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C51Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A81 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJS and IBHG are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJSC
IBHGA
In short
BSJS Junk bonds with an end date. BSJS holds roughly 180 high-yield corporate bonds that all mature in 2028, then winds down around December 15, 2028 and pays out cash, so it behaves more like a single bond than a perpetual bond fund.
IBHG Most target-maturity bond ETFs stick to Treasuries and investment grade. IBHG runs the same ladder-rung playbook in high yield: a basket of dollar-denominated junk and other income bonds all maturing in 2027.
Stated mandate
BSJS The Fund seeks to track the performance of a high-yield corporate bond index composed of US-dollar-denominated bonds maturing in 2028. It uses sampling, rebalances monthly, and is scheduled to terminate around December 15, 2028.
IBHG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated, high-yield and other income-generating corporate bonds maturing in 2027.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJS vs IBHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJS vs IBHG Cost
Overpaying BSJS vs IBHG
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJS 0.42%
$8,472
IBHG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJS | IBHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJS
- 0.35%IBHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHG cheapest of 21 funds
BSJS 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJS vs IBHG Dividends
- BSJS 6.09%, better
- IBHG 5.90%
- BSJS $1.31
- IBHG $1.29
- BSJS $0.11
- IBHG $0.10
- BSJS Oct 19, 2026
- IBHG Oct 1, 2026
- BSJS Oct 23, 2026
- IBHG Oct 6, 2026
- BSJS Monthly
- IBHG Monthly
Distribution history
BSJS vs IBHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSJS
- IBHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJS 4.1%IBHG 3.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJS 1.03, betterIBHG 1.00
- Worst fall
- BSJS −17.7%IBHG −13.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSJS 0.58IBHG 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.