IBHF ranks 1st and IBHG 3rd of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
IBHF vs IBHG
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.35%0.35%
IBHF 1.8×the volume
222K127K
IBHF +0.4pt
+4.1%+3.7%
IBHF vs IBHG Performance
+22.2%+19.8%
- IBHF 0.35%
- IBHG 0.35%
- IBHF $613M
- IBHG $532M
- IBHF +2.1%
- IBHG +2.9%, better
- IBHF 5.69%
- IBHG 5.90%, better
- IBHF 38
- IBHG 395
- IBHF 222K sh, better
- IBHG 127K sh
- IBHF $22.56
- IBHG $21.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBHF | IBHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A85 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B59 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | F22 | D29Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | A81 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. IBHF and IBHG are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBHFA
IBHGA
In short
IBHG Most target-maturity bond ETFs stick to Treasuries and investment grade. IBHG runs the same ladder-rung playbook in high yield: a basket of dollar-denominated junk and other income bonds all maturing in 2027.
Stated mandate
IBHG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated, high-yield and other income-generating corporate bonds maturing in 2027.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBHF vs IBHG Holdings
How IBHF and IBHG differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country87.4%
Sector
No Sector split for IBHF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBHFMore in IBHG | IBHF | IBHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IBHF +12.3 points | 95.2% | 82.9% |
| Japan | IBHG +5.9 points | 0.0% | 5.9% |
| Macau | IBHG +4.7 points | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Australia | IBHG +1.3 points | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Other countries (9) | IBHG +0.5 points | 4.8% | 5.3% |
Concentration
- IBHF89.3%
- IBHG28.5%
- IBHF35
- IBHG393
Asset class
- IBHF
- Fixed Income
- IBHG
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBHF holds 35 securities, IBHG 393.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBHF vs IBHG Cost
Same expense ratio
$7,126
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBHF 0.35%
$7,126
IBHG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBHF | IBHG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $634 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,454 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,126 |
- 0.35%IBHF
- 0.35%IBHG
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHF cheapest of 21 funds
IBHG cheapest of 21 funds
IBHF vs IBHG Dividends
- IBHF 5.69%
- IBHG 5.90%, better
- IBHF $1.28
- IBHG $1.29
- IBHF $0.07
- IBHG $0.10
- IBHF Oct 1, 2026
- IBHG Oct 1, 2026
- IBHF Oct 6, 2026
- IBHG Oct 6, 2026
- IBHF Monthly
- IBHG Monthly
Distribution history
IBHF vs IBHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IBHF
- IBHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBHF 2.3%, betterIBHG 3.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBHF 1.16, betterIBHG 1.00
- Worst fall
- IBHF −11.2%, betterIBHG −13.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IBHF 0.31IBHG 0.47
IBHF and IBHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
