IBHF ranks 2nd and BSJX 17th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJX vs IBHF
IBHF −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
IBHF 38.8×the volume
5.61K217K
BSJX vs IBHF Performance
+2.7%+2.2%
- BSJX 0.42%
- IBHF 0.35%, better
- BSJX $22M
- IBHF $601M
- BSJX +2.7%, better
- IBHF +2.2%
- BSJX 6.88%, better
- IBHF 5.47%
- BSJX 153
- IBHF 33
- BSJX 5.61K sh
- IBHF 217K sh, better
- BSJX $24.34
- IBHF $22.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJX | IBHF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D30 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | B62Higher | F22 |
| Durability | D30 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJX and IBHF are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJXC
IBHFA
In short
BSJX A junk-bond ladder rung with a due date: roughly 140 high-yield corporate bonds that all mature in 2033, monthly payouts, and a basket that winds down as the year arrives.
Stated mandate
BSJX The Fund tracks an index of US dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds whose effective maturities are in 2033.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJX vs IBHF Holdings
How BSJX and IBHF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country92.4%
Sector
No Sector split for BSJX and IBHF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BSJXMore in IBHF | Gap | BSJX | IBHF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IBHF +7.3 points | 89.4% | 96.7% | |
| United Kingdom | BSJX +2.1 points | 2.8% | 0.7% | |
| Luxembourg | BSJX +2.0 points | 2.0% | 0.0% | |
| Netherlands | BSJX +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% | |
| Denmark | BSJX +0.9 points | 0.9% | 0.0% | |
| Other countries (4) | BSJX +1.0 points | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Concentration
- BSJX15.3%
- IBHF91.3%
- BSJX152
- IBHF30
Asset class
- BSJX
- Bonds
- IBHF
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BSJX holds 152 securities, IBHF 30.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJX vs IBHF Cost
Overpaying BSJX vs IBHF
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJX 0.42%
$8,472
IBHF 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJX | IBHF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJX
- 0.35%IBHF, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHF cheapest of 21 funds
BSJX 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJX vs IBHF Dividends
- BSJX 6.88%, better
- IBHF 5.47%
- BSJX $1.69
- IBHF $1.23
- BSJX $0.14
- IBHF $0.08
- BSJX Oct 19, 2026
- IBHF Nov 2, 2026
- BSJX Oct 23, 2026
- IBHF Nov 5, 2026
- BSJX Monthly
- IBHF Monthly
Distribution history
BSJX vs IBHF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJX 4.6%IBHF 2.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJX −0.15IBHF 1.16
- Worst fall
- BSJX −3.8%IBHF −11.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BSJX 0.20IBHF 0.31
BSJX and IBHF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
