IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMR 8th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMR vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 1.7×the volume
75.9K129K
IBMQ +0.1pt
+0.7%+0.8%
BSMR vs IBMQ Performance
+3.4%+3.9%
- BSMR 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMR $373M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMR +2.2%
- IBMQ +2.2%
- BSMR 2.73%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMR 2715
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMR 75.9K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMR $23.48
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMR | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B59Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | C49 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A80 | A94Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMR and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMRB
IBMQA
In short
BSMR One rung of a muni ladder in a single ticker: BSMR holds municipal bonds maturing in 2027, then winds itself up and pays out cash. It behaves more like a bond you hold to maturity than a perpetual bond fund.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMR The fund seeks to track its investment results before fees and expenses.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMR vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMR vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMR vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMR 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMR | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMR
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMR 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMR vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMR 2.73%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMR $0.64
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMR $0.06
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMR Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMR Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMR Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMR vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMR
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMR 2.9%, betterIBMQ 3.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMR −0.16IBMQ −0.14, better
- Worst fall
- BSMR −11.4%IBMQ −10.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMR 0.52IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.