IBMP ranks 1st and IBMQ 2nd of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs IBMQ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.10%0.10%
IBMQ 1.2×the volume
105K129K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+0.8%+0.8%
IBMP vs IBMQ Performance
+4.3%+3.9%
- IBMP 0.10%
- IBMQ 0.10%
- IBMP $685M
- IBMQ $691M
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- IBMQ +2.2%
- IBMP 2.53%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- IBMP 1859
- IBMQ 2957
- IBMP 105K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- IBMP $25.35
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A87 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | A90 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A96Higher | A94 |
| Durability | A94 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
IBMQA
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs IBMQ Cost
Same expense ratio
$2,106
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $183 |
| 20 | $717 | $717 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $2,106 |
- 0.10%IBMP
- 0.10%IBMQ
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs IBMQ Dividends
- IBMP 2.53%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- IBMP $0.64
- IBMQ $0.63
- IBMP $0.06
- IBMQ $0.06
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IBMP
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%, betterIBMQ 3.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33IBMQ −0.14, better
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%, betterIBMQ −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.