IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMW 18th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMW vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 2.0×the volume
65.4K129K
BSMW +0.5pt
+4.5%+4.0%
BSMW vs IBMQ Performance
0.0%+2.2%
- BSMW 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMW $241M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMW 0.0%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMW 3.33%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMW 2022
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMW 65.4K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMW $24.30
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMW | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D36 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A94Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMW and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMWC
IBMQA
In short
BSMW A rung of a municipal bond ladder in ETF form: investment-grade munis effectively maturing in 2032, after which the fund winds up and pays out. One bond's end date, with well over a thousand bonds inside.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMW The Fund tracks the investment results of the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2032 Index. The index covers investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated municipal bonds maturing or effectively maturing in 2032.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMW vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMW vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMW vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMW 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMW | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMW
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMW 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMW vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMW 3.33%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMW $0.81
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMW $0.07
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMW Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMW Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMW Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMW vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMW 6.8%IBMQ 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMW 0.03, betterIBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMW −7.6%IBMQ −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMW 1.16IBMQ 0.54
BSMW and IBMQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

