IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMY 16th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMY vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 3.2×the volume
40.4K129K
BSMY vs IBMQ Performance
−0.7%+2.2%
- BSMY 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMY $165M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMY −0.7%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMY 3.75%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMY 2328
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMY 40.4K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMY $23.61
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMY | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | B59 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D27 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A94Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMY and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMYC
IBMQA
In short
BSMY A single-year rung on a muni ladder: roughly 2,000 bonds from US states, agencies and local governments, all effectively maturing in 2034, bundled into one ticker on Invesco's BulletShares shelf.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMY The Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds represented by its index, which covers U.S.-dollar municipal securities issued by U.S. states, state agencies, or local governments and maturing effectively in 2034.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMY vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMY vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMY vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMY 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMY | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMY
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMY 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMY vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMY 3.75%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMY $0.89
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMY $0.07
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMY Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMY Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMY Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMY vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMY 7.0%IBMQ 3.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMY −0.48IBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMY −7.9%IBMQ −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMY 0.28IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.