Skip to content

BSTP vs SWAN

Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

BSTPDNYSE Arca

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

SWANBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SWAN −0.40pt a year

BSTP0.89%SWAN0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

SWAN 2.0×the volume

BSTP4.11KSWAN8.3K

3Y return · a year

BSTP +0.2pt

BSTP+15.3%SWAN+15.1%

BSTP vs SWAN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.3%BSTP+1.4%SWAN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BSTP +8.3%. SWAN +1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSTP 0.89%
SWAN 0.49%, better
Fund size
BSTP $59M
SWAN $152M
1Y total return
BSTP +8.3%, better
SWAN +1.4%
Yield (12M)
BSTP No data
SWAN 3.41%
Holdings
BSTP 3
SWAN 14
Avg volume (30D)
BSTP 4.11K sh
SWAN 8.3K sh, better
NAV per share
BSTP $39.96
SWAN $32.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSTP: Cost 9, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 62. SWAN: Cost 78, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 54, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSTP, SWAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSTPSWAN
Cost30% weightF9A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36HigherF24
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB62
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC54
Durability5% weightB62A79Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSTP and SWAN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

SWAN ranks 1st and BSTP 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 6DDHSBDay Hagan Smart Buffer ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 7DBSTPInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSTPDInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

SWANBAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

In short

BSTP Most buffer ETFs freeze your cap and buffer for a full year. BSTP is the active version: FLEX options on SPY that the manager can reset monthly, so the terms follow the market rather than a calendar.

SWAN The buffer fund that isn't one. Rather than a yearly reset and a capped ceiling, SWAN holds roughly 90% U.S. Treasuries and spends the other 10% on in-the-money S&P 500 call options, aiming for uncapped index exposure with a bond core underneath.

Stated mandate

BSTP BSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through FLEX options and may invest directly in SPY or its components. It actively monitors and may reset the options portfolio monthly, seeking participation in SPY returns with an upside limit and protection against a measure of downside loss.

SWAN The fund seeks to track the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while pursuing uncapped S&P 500 exposure and buffering against significant losses. Its strategy uses approximately 90% U.S. Treasury securities and 10% SPY in-the-money call options.

Why people hold it

  • BSTP No 12-month lock. The manager monitors the options book and can reset it monthly, seeking SPY participation with a limit on the upside and protection against a measure of downside loss.
  • The step-up design lets the options be re-struck as SPY moves, instead of leaving the fund anchored to a reference level set at the start of a long outcome period.
  • One ticker, no calendar to babysit: the resetting happens inside the fund, which can also hold SPY or its underlying stocks directly alongside the options.
  • Live since 2022, so the strategy has run through real market stress rather than a backtest.
  • SWAN Cheapest in its peer group at 0.49%, against a 0.79% median for buffer-style rivals such as BAPR (0.79%) and BUFR (0.95%).
  • No ceiling on gains. Defined-outcome funds sell away upside above a cap; SWAN's in-the-money SPY calls are built to leave the index climb uncapped.amplifyetfs.com
  • No outcome period to track: no annual reset date, no entry-timing math, no cap that expires and resets.amplifyetfs.com
  • Running the same recipe since 2018, through live market stress rather than backtests, and it stands among the stronger builds in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • BSTP The 0.89% expense ratio sits at the pricier end of SPY buffer funds. Innovator's dated series on the same reference, such as PMAY, lists 0.79%.
  • Thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the largest buffer names.
  • Flexibility cuts both ways: with terms able to change at each reset, the cap and buffer in force aren't readable off a calendar and need checking against the fund's posted terms.
  • SWAN The cushion isn't a stated number. Unlike a named-depth buffer fund (FEBT, DMAX), SWAN's downside comes from Treasuries plus option value, so it moves with markets.amplifyetfs.com
  • About 90% of the portfolio is Treasuries, so interest-rate moves drive results as much as the S&P 500 does.amplifyetfs.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads deserve more attention than with the giant buffer names.

Full BSTP profile⁠

Full SWAN profile⁠

BSTP vs SWAN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSTP vs SWAN Cost

Overpaying BSTP vs SWAN

$7,080

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

  • SWAN 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSTP 0.89%
  • SWAN 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSTP $16,872SWAN $9,792

Year by year

YearBSTPSWANOverpaying
10$1,576$883$693
20$5,953$3,394$2,559
30$16,872$9,792$7,080

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%BSTP
  • 0.49%SWAN, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

SWAN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP 7th cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP vs SWAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSTP No data
SWAN 3.41%
Payout (12M)
BSTP None
SWAN $1.10
Last payment
BSTP No data
SWAN $0.27
Ex-dividend
BSTP No data
SWAN Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
BSTP No data
SWAN Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
BSTP No data
SWAN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

BSTPAll BSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SWANQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll SWAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.07; Mar 28, 2019 $0.12; Jun 27, 2019 $0.11; Sep 27, 2019 $0.08; Dec 30, 2019 $0.75; Mar 27, 2020 $0.07; Jun 26, 2020 $0.03; Sep 28, 2020 $0.007; Dec 29, 2020 $0.43; Mar 29, 2021 $0.007; Jun 28, 2021 $0.02; Sep 28, 2021 $0.04; Dec 29, 2021 $1.68; Mar 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 28, 2022 $0.10; Sep 28, 2022 $0.18; Dec 28, 2022 $0.18; Mar 29, 2023 $0.20; Jun 28, 2023 $0.19; Sep 27, 2023 $0.19; Dec 27, 2023 $0.21; Mar 26, 2024 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.19; Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.24; Jun 29, 2026 $0.35; Sep 29, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

BSTP vs SWAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSTP 7.8%, betterSWAN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSTP 1.31, betterSWAN 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSTP −16.7%since Mar 2022SWAN −31.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSTP 0.69SWAN 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • BSTPDvsPSFFB

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsPSFFB

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsQBSVC

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsQBSVC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsFBC

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsFBC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.