Skip to content

FB vs SWAN

ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

FBCCboe

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

SWANBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SWAN −0.09pt a year

FB0.58%SWAN0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

SWAN 4.2×the volume

FB1.99KSWAN8.3K

FB vs SWAN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.3%FB+1.4%SWAN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FB +10.3%. SWAN +1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FB 0.58%
SWAN 0.49%, better
Fund size
FB $4M
SWAN $152M
1Y total return
FB +10.3%, better
SWAN +1.4%
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
SWAN 3.41%, better
Holdings
FB 502
SWAN 14
Avg volume (30D)
FB 1.99K sh
SWAN 8.3K sh, better
NAV per share
FB $45.42
SWAN $32.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FB: Cost 65, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 80, Durability 38. SWAN: Cost 78, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 54, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for FB, SWAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFBSWAN
Cost30% weightB65A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherF24
Tradability15% weightB56B62Higher
Holdings10% weightA80HigherC54
Durability5% weightD38A79Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FB and SWAN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

SWAN ranks 1st and FB 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CQBSVAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 4CFBProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 4CHJUNCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FBCProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

SWANBAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

In short

FB Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month outcome period. FB resets daily, using one-day S&P 500 options to set a fresh cap and cushion sized to what the market expects volatility to be.

SWAN The buffer fund that isn't one. Rather than a yearly reset and a capped ceiling, SWAN holds roughly 90% U.S. Treasuries and spends the other 10% on in-the-money S&P 500 call options, aiming for uncapped index exposure with a bond core underneath.

Stated mandate

FB The fund seeks participation in S&P 500 gains while mitigating daily losses and reducing volatility. It uses long exposure and one-day options on the index; daily upside caps and downside buffers are adjusted according to expected market volatility.

SWAN The fund seeks to track the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while pursuing uncapped S&P 500 exposure and buffering against significant losses. Its strategy uses approximately 90% U.S. Treasury securities and 10% SPY in-the-money call options.

Why people hold it

  • FB The reset is daily, not annual. One-day options set a new upside cap and downside buffer each session, so there's no waiting out a year-long period to start over.proshares.com
  • Cap and buffer flex with expected volatility instead of being fixed for a year, tightening or widening as conditions change.proshares.com
  • At 0.58%, it undercuts the typical buffer fund's fee, including BUFR at 0.95% and BAPR at 0.79%.
  • Plain plumbing under the hood: long S&P 500 exposure plus index options, with quarterly distributions.
  • SWAN Cheapest in its peer group at 0.49%, against a 0.79% median for buffer-style rivals such as BAPR (0.79%) and BUFR (0.95%).
  • No ceiling on gains. Defined-outcome funds sell away upside above a cap; SWAN's in-the-money SPY calls are built to leave the index climb uncapped.amplifyetfs.com
  • No outcome period to track: no annual reset date, no entry-timing math, no cap that expires and resets.amplifyetfs.com
  • Running the same recipe since 2018, through live market stress rather than backtests, and it stands among the stronger builds in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • FB Daily buffers cushion daily moves. A slow grind lower over many sessions can still add up, since each day's protection applies only to that day.proshares.com
  • Launched in 2025, so the record is short and hasn't been tested across different market regimes.
  • Small and lightly traded compared with established buffer funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the point of trade.
  • SWAN The cushion isn't a stated number. Unlike a named-depth buffer fund (FEBT, DMAX), SWAN's downside comes from Treasuries plus option value, so it moves with markets.amplifyetfs.com
  • About 90% of the portfolio is Treasuries, so interest-rate moves drive results as much as the S&P 500 does.amplifyetfs.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads deserve more attention than with the giant buffer names.

Full FB profile⁠

Full SWAN profile⁠

FB vs SWAN Holdings

How FB and SWAN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FB and 0.0% of SWAN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.8%

Sector

No Sector split for FB.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FB and SWAN, widest gap first
CountryMore in FBMore in SWAN
United StatesFB +0.3 points
SwitzerlandSWAN +0.2 points
ChinaSWAN +0.1 points
MexicoSWAN +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FB41.6%
  • SWAN87.1%

Securities held

  • FB501
  • SWAN13

Asset class

FB
Equity
SWAN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FB501
  • In both0
  • Only in SWAN13

Only in FB

501 securities, 90.7% of FB by weight

  • Apple Inc6.99%
  • NVIDIA Corp6.89%
  • Microsoft Corp5.39%

Only in SWAN

13 securities, 98.4% of SWAN by weight

  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.375% 11/15/20318.81%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 4% 11/15/20358.75%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.875% 05/15/20328.74%

Weight gaps

FB and SWAN share no securities.

All FB holdings⁠All 12 SWAN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FB vs SWAN Cost

Overpaying FB vs SWAN

$1,661

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FB 0.58%

    $11,453

  • SWAN 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FB 0.58%
  • SWAN 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FB $11,453SWAN $9,792

Year by year

YearFBSWANOverpaying
10$1,041$883$158
20$3,986$3,394$592
30$11,453$9,792$1,661

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%FB
  • 0.49%SWAN, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

SWAN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

FB 3rd cheapest of 7 funds

FB vs SWAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FB 1.83%
SWAN 3.41%, better
Payout (12M)
FB $0.83
SWAN $1.10
Last payment
FB $0.09
SWAN $0.27
Ex-dividend
FB Sep 23, 2026
SWAN Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
FB Sep 29, 2026
SWAN Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
FB Quarterly
SWAN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FBQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll FB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2025 $0.14; Dec 24, 2025 $0.24; Mar 25, 2026 $0.16; Jun 24, 2026 $0.34; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD
SWANQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll SWAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.07; Mar 28, 2019 $0.12; Jun 27, 2019 $0.11; Sep 27, 2019 $0.08; Dec 30, 2019 $0.75; Mar 27, 2020 $0.07; Jun 26, 2020 $0.03; Sep 28, 2020 $0.007; Dec 29, 2020 $0.43; Mar 29, 2021 $0.007; Jun 28, 2021 $0.02; Sep 28, 2021 $0.04; Dec 29, 2021 $1.68; Mar 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 28, 2022 $0.10; Sep 28, 2022 $0.18; Dec 28, 2022 $0.18; Mar 29, 2023 $0.20; Jun 28, 2023 $0.19; Sep 27, 2023 $0.19; Dec 27, 2023 $0.21; Mar 26, 2024 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.19; Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.24; Jun 29, 2026 $0.35; Sep 29, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

FB vs SWAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FB 3.1%since Jul 2025SWAN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FB 2.14since Jul 2025SWAN 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FB −1.7%since Jun 2025SWAN −31.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FB 0.24SWAN 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • FBCvsPSFFB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsPSFFB

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsQBSVC

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsQBSVC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FBCvsHJUNC

    ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF · Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SWANBvsHJUNC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.