UNHG ranks 2nd and BTCU 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BTCU vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
UNHG −0.36pt a year
1.13%0.77%
UNHG 26.7×the volume
27.2K726K
BTCU vs UNHG Performance
+38.6%−11.0%
- BTCU 1.13%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- BTCU $5M
- UNHG $63M
- BTCU
- UNHG +8.4%
- BTCU 8
- UNHG 5
- BTCU 27.2K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- BTCU $22.44
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | A82 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B55 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BTCU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCUC
UNHGA
In short
BTCU What if you could get 2x daily bitcoin without touching futures? That's BTCU: swaps written on a spot bitcoin ETF, targeting 200% of bitcoin's daily move. 1.13% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
BTCU BTCU seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of Bitcoin's price performance before fees and expenses.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCU vs UNHG Holdings
How BTCU and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BTCU and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTCU and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BTCU.
Concentration
- BTCU100.0%
- UNHG213.5%
- BTCU2
- UNHG1
Asset class
- BTCU
- Leveraged/Inverse
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BTCU2
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in BTCU
2 securities, 18.5% of BTCU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50611.01%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut7.46%
Only in UNHG
1 security, 13.5% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204013.47%
Weight gaps
BTCU and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying BTCU vs UNHG
$5,935
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCU 1.13%
$20,764
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,981 | $1,371 | $610 |
| 20 | $7,403 | $5,205 | $2,198 |
| 30 | $20,764 | $14,829 | $5,935 |
- 1.13%BTCU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
BTCU 221st cheapest of 315 funds
BTCU vs UNHG Dividends
- BTCU $0.16
- UNHG $1.90
- BTCU Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- BTCU Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- BTCU Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
BTCU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCU UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCU UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BTCU UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BTCU 0.00UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.13% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.