Skip to content

BUFC vs PSMO

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.20pt a year

BUFC0.69%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 6.8×the volume

BUFC49.5KPSMO7.3K

BUFC vs PSMO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+10.0%PSMO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. PSMO +10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
PSMO +10.0%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPSMO
Cost30% weightB57A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC41C54Higher
Tradability15% weightB62B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and BUFC 4th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

BUFC vs PSMO Holdings

As of

How BUFC and PSMO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFC and 0.0% of PSMO.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BUFC and PSMO, widest gap first
SectorMore in BUFCMore in PSMO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMO +1.2 points
TechnologyBUFC +1.0 points
Health CareBUFC +1.1 points
CommunicationPSMO +0.7 points
EnergyBUFC +0.3 points
FinancialsBUFC +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSMO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSMO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSMO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSMO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSMO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BUFC and PSMO, widest gap first
CountryMore in BUFCMore in PSMO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BUFC100.3%
  • PSMO104.3%

Securities held

  • BUFC3
  • PSMO2

Asset class

BUFC
Alternatives
PSMO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BUFC3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMO2

Only in BUFC

3 securities, 100% of BUFC by weight

  • 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.86 4SPY 11/30/26 C3.8698.06%
  • 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.49 4SPY 11/30/26 P772.491.75%
  • Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5870.53%

Only in PSMO

2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C98.58%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P4.59%

Weight gaps

BUFC and PSMO share no securities.

All 7 BUFC holdings⁠All 6 PSMO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying BUFC vs PSMO

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BUFC $13,429PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearBUFCPSMOOverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PSMO None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPOCTC

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPOCTC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.