CIBR ranks 4th and BUG 8th of 8 funds in the Cybersecurity Category.
BUG vs CIBR
BUG −0.08pt a year
0.50%0.58%
CIBR 1.2×the volume
1.56M1.81M
CIBR +5.2pt
+8.7%+13.9%
BUG vs CIBR Performance
+51.5%+91.3%
- BUG 0.50%, better
- CIBR 0.58%
- BUG $2.27B
- CIBR $17.5B
- BUG +43.6%, better
- CIBR +31.4%
- BUG 0.02%
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- BUG 31
- CIBR 46
- BUG 1.56M sh
- CIBR 1.81M sh, better
- BUG $49.40
- CIBR $100.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUG | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42Higher | D31 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | D32 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A75 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | B55Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A92Higher |
Rank among Cybersecurity funds
Same Category. BUG and CIBR are both graded against the same 8 Cybersecurity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUGC
CIBRB
In short
BUG A concentrated, rules-based bet on the companies selling digital locks: about 30 cybersecurity names tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, priced right at the going rate for the theme.
CIBR A 2015-vintage cybersecurity fund that grew into a multi-billion-dollar one. It tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with a tight basket of roughly 30 names, so every holding carries real weight.
Stated mandate
BUG The Fund seeks investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Indxx Cybersecurity Index before fees and expenses.
CIBR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index through an indexing approach. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in the index's common stocks and depositary receipts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUG vs CIBR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUG vs CIBR Cost
Overpaying CIBR vs BUG
$1,474
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUG 0.50%
$9,979
CIBR 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUG | CIBR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,041 | $141 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,986 | $526 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,453 | $1,474 |
- 0.50%BUG, cheaper
- 0.58%CIBR
- Middle half of Cybersecurity funds
- Median 0.46%
BUG 6th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
BUG vs CIBR Dividends
- BUG 0.02%
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- BUG $0.01
- CIBR $0.39
- BUG $0.01
- CIBR $0.0029
- BUG Dec 30, 2025
- CIBR Sep 24, 2026
- BUG Jan 7, 2026
- CIBR Sep 30, 2026
- BUG Annual
- CIBR Quarterly
Distribution history
BUG vs CIBR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BUG
- CIBR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUG 29.4%CIBR 23.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BUG 0.85CIBR 1.09, better
- Worst fall
- BUG −41.7%CIBR −33.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BUG 1.13CIBR 1.02
BUG and CIBR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





