IHAK ranks 1st and CIBR 4th of 8 funds in the Cybersecurity Category.
CIBR vs IHAK
33.7%by weight
IHAK −0.11pt a year
0.58%0.47%
CIBR 9.3×the volume
1.81M194K
CIBR +4.3pt
+13.9%+9.6%
CIBR vs IHAK Performance
+91.3%+58.2%
- CIBR 0.58%
- IHAK 0.47%, better
- CIBR $17.5B
- IHAK $1.26B
- CIBR +31.4%
- IHAK +42.1%, better
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- IHAK 0.06%
- CIBR 46
- IHAK 47
- CIBR 1.81M sh, better
- IHAK 194K sh
- CIBR $100.98
- IHAK $73.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIBR | IHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | B58Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B63 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B55 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | A73 |
Rank among Cybersecurity funds
Same Category. CIBR and IHAK are both graded against the same 8 Cybersecurity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIBRB
IHAKB
In short
CIBR A 2015-vintage cybersecurity fund that grew into a multi-billion-dollar one. It tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with a tight basket of roughly 30 names, so every holding carries real weight.
IHAK The cheap, genuinely global way to own cybersecurity. IHAK tracks a worldwide cyber index that reaches into emerging markets, holds roughly 40 names, and undercuts the category's two best-known funds on fees.
Stated mandate
CIBR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index through an indexing approach. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in the index's common stocks and depositary receipts.
IHAK The fund tracks a global equity index of companies focused on cybersecurity hardware, software, and services, providing exposure across developed and emerging markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIBR vs IHAK Holdings
How CIBR and IHAK differ
33.7%
Shared holdings make up 74.0% of IHAK and 44.3% of CIBR.
Level by level
- Holdings33.7%
- Country85.0%
- Sector91.7%
Sector
| Sector | More in CIBRMore in IHAK | CIBR | IHAK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | IHAK +8.3 points | 2.9% | 11.2% |
| Technology | CIBR +6.1 points | 94.9% | 88.8% |
| Communication | CIBR +2.2 points | 2.2% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CIBRMore in IHAK | CIBR | IHAK |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CIBR +11.2 points | 91.3% | 80.1% |
| Israel | IHAK +3.2 points | 2.2% | 5.4% |
| Japan | IHAK +2.8 points | 1.0% | 3.8% |
| Denmark | IHAK +2.6 points | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Taiwan | IHAK +2.1 points | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| India | CIBR +1.9 points | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| France | CIBR +1.9 points | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Germany | IHAK +1.5 points | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Other countries (2) | IHAK +2.8 points | 1.7% | 4.5% |
Concentration
- CIBR55.2%
- IHAK52.7%
- CIBR45
- IHAK35
Asset class
- CIBR
- Equity
- IHAK
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CIBR26
- In both19
- Only in IHAK16
Only in CIBR
26 securities, 55.5% of CIBR by weight
- Cisco Systems, Inc.7.48%
- Broadcom Inc.6.97%
- Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A)3.64%
- Rubrik, Inc. (Class A)2.97%
- F5, Inc.2.79%
- Accenture plc2.69%
- International Business Machines Corporation2.18%
- NetApp, Inc.2.13%
- Gen Digital Inc.2.10%
- Dynatrace, Inc.2.09%
- Infosys Limited (ADR)2.06%
- Microsoft Corporation2.04%
- Leidos Holdings, Inc.2.02%
- Datadog, Inc. (Class A)1.96%
- JFrog Ltd.1.87%
- Thales S.A.1.83%
- Arista Networks, Inc.1.71%
- Alphabet Inc. (Class A)1.63%
- Elastic N.V.1.51%
- Commvault Systems, Inc.0.96%
- BlackBerry Ltd.0.88%
- Open Text Corporation0.78%
- Fastly, Inc. (Class A)0.48%
- NetScout Systems, Inc.0.39%
- Ziff Davis, Inc.0.24%
- Atos Group0.10%
Only in IHAK
16 securities, 25.9% of IHAK by weight
- Caci International Inc Class A3.98%
- Alarm.com Holdings3.63%
- Blackberry2.80%
- Clear Secure Class A2.64%
- Netcompany Group2.59%
- Calix Networks2.55%
- Accton Technology1.98%
- Sailpoint1.66%
- Teamviewer1.57%
- Ncc Group PLC0.64%
- Gb Group PLC0.59%
- Allot Ltd0.48%
- Digital Arts Inc0.43%
- Gorilla Technology Group0.23%
- Zetrix Ai0.09%
- Twd/Usd0.00%
Weight gaps
All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CIBRMore in IHAK | CIBR | IHAK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netskope, Inc. (Class A) | IHAK +6.05 points | 0.81% | 6.86% |
| Qualys, Inc. | IHAK +5.30 points | 1.08% | 6.38% |
| Tenable Holdings, Inc. | IHAK +4.89 points | 0.81% | 5.70% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) | CIBR +3.91 points | 8.58% | 4.67% |
| Varonis Systems, Inc. | IHAK +3.83 points | 0.84% | 4.67% |
| SentinelOne, Inc. (Class A) | IHAK +3.57 points | 1.36% | 4.93% |
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | CIBR +3.37 points | 7.58% | 4.21% |
| Fortinet, Inc. | CIBR +3.36 points | 6.30% | 2.94% |
| Science Applications International Corporation | IHAK +3.19 points | 0.96% | 4.15% |
| Trend Micro Incorporated | IHAK +2.44 points | 1.04% | 3.48% |
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | IHAK +1.98 points | 1.50% | 3.48% |
| A10 Networks, Inc. | IHAK +1.80 points | 0.26% | 2.06% |
| Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | IHAK +1.40 points | 2.10% | 3.50% |
| Zscaler, Inc. | IHAK +1.32 points | 4.37% | 5.69% |
| Radware Ltd. | IHAK +1.30 points | 0.16% | 1.46% |
| Rapid7, Inc. | IHAK +1.13 points | 0.16% | 1.29% |
| Okta, Inc. | IHAK +1.00 points | 4.49% | 5.49% |
| OneSpan Inc. | IHAK +0.97 points | 0.15% | 1.12% |
| Akamai Technologies, Inc. | IHAK +0.16 points | 1.78% | 1.94% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIBR vs IHAK Cost
Overpaying CIBR vs IHAK
$2,035
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIBR 0.58%
$11,453
IHAK 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIBR | IHAK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $847 | $194 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $3,261 | $725 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $9,418 | $2,035 |
- 0.58%CIBR
- 0.47%IHAK, cheaper
- Middle half of Cybersecurity funds
- Median 0.46%
IHAK 5th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR vs IHAK Dividends
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- IHAK 0.06%
- CIBR $0.39
- IHAK $0.04
- CIBR $0.0029
- IHAK $0.0072
- CIBR Sep 24, 2026
- IHAK Jun 15, 2026
- CIBR Sep 30, 2026
- IHAK Jun 18, 2026
- CIBR Quarterly
- IHAK Twice a year
Distribution history
CIBR vs IHAK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CIBR
- IHAK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIBR 23.8%IHAK 20.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CIBR 1.09, betterIHAK 1.02
- Worst fall
- CIBR −33.9%, betterIHAK −34.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CIBR 1.02IHAK 0.92
CIBR and IHAK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





