SCHG ranks 2nd and BUL 35th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
BUL vs SCHG
SCHG −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
SCHG 806.0×the volume
9.42K7.59M
SCHG +2.8pt
+9.0%+11.8%
BUL vs SCHG Performance
+53.9%+74.3%
- BUL 0.60%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- BUL $127M
- SCHG $61.7B
- BUL +13.9%, better
- SCHG +3.3%
- BUL 0.16%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- BUL 51
- SCHG 187
- BUL 9.42K sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- BUL $60.71
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUL | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | F22 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C50Higher | D36 |
| Durability | C41 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. BUL and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BULD
SCHGA
In short
BUL Growth stocks that actually generate cash. BUL screens the growth half of the S&P 900 and keeps about 50 names that clear free cash flow and quality tests, Pacer's Cash Cows logic pointed at growth.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
BUL The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, which screens the S&P 900 Pure Growth Index and selects leading companies using free cash flow yield and quality criteria.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUL vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUL vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying BUL vs SCHG
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUL 0.60%
$11,817
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUL | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%BUL
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
BUL 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
BUL vs SCHG Dividends
- BUL 0.16%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- BUL $0.10
- SCHG $0.14
- BUL $0.0061
- SCHG $0.04
- BUL Jun 4, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- BUL Jun 8, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- BUL Twice a year
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
BUL vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BUL
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUL 14.0%, betterSCHG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUL 1.13SCHG 1.16, better
- Worst fall
- BUL −27.9%, betterSCHG −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUL 0.82SCHG 1.20
BUL and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

