Skip to content

BUL vs SCHG

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

BULDNYSE Arca

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

SCHGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHG −0.56pt a year

BUL0.60%SCHG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHG 806.0×the volume

BUL9.42KSCHG7.59M

5Y return · a year

SCHG +2.8pt

BUL+9.0%SCHG+11.8%

BUL vs SCHG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+53.9%BUL+74.3%SCHG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BUL +53.9%. SCHG +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUL 0.60%
SCHG 0.04%, better
Fund size
BUL $127M
SCHG $61.7B
1Y total return
BUL +13.9%, better
SCHG +3.3%
Yield (12M)
BUL 0.16%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Holdings
BUL 51
SCHG 187
Avg volume (30D)
BUL 9.42K sh
SCHG 7.59M sh, better
NAV per share
BUL $60.71
SCHG $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUL: Cost 6, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 22, Holdings 50, Durability 41. SCHG: Cost 96, Risk 41, Mission 92, Tradability 87, Holdings 36, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUL, SCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBULSCHG
Cost30% weightF6A96Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA92
Risk15% weightB67HigherC41
Tradability15% weightF22A87Higher
Holdings10% weightC50HigherD36
Durability5% weightC41A75Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUL and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SCHG ranks 2nd and BUL 35th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 5AVUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 34DFSGSFirst Trust SMID Growth Strength ETFScore 36
  7. Rank 35DBULPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BULDPacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

SCHGASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

In short

BUL Growth stocks that actually generate cash. BUL screens the growth half of the S&P 900 and keeps about 50 names that clear free cash flow and quality tests, Pacer's Cash Cows logic pointed at growth.

SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.

Stated mandate

BUL The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, which screens the S&P 900 Pure Growth Index and selects leading companies using free cash flow yield and quality criteria.

SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.

Why people hold it

  • BUL Cash flow is the gate, not the story. The index starts from S&P 900 pure growth names and keeps only those clearing free cash flow and quality screens.paceretfs.com
  • Deliberately concentrated: about 50 holdings, so the screen actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting diluted by hundreds of names.
  • Live since 2019 and pays shareholders quarterly, with a published rules-based index behind every rebalance.
  • SCHG 0.04% a year against a growth-category median of 0.18%. Costs sit near the floor of the group.
  • Hews closely to the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, one of the tighter index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2009, a multi-billion-dollar fund, and one of the busier tickers in the growth aisle, so entering and exiting is usually cheap and easy.
  • The benchmark is carved out of a total-market growth index, not S&P 500 membership, so a stock does not need an index committee's nod to qualify.

Worth knowing

  • BUL Cost is the trade-off: 0.60% a year, versus roughly 0.18% for the typical US growth fund and a few basis points at VUG or SCHG.
  • Thinly traded compared with the category's giants, so spreads and order size deserve more attention here.
  • A rules screen means it can look very different from a plain growth index in any given stretch, for better or worse.
  • SCHG Growth-only by design. Value and dividend-heavy corners of the market sit outside the mandate, so the ride differs from a total-market fund.
  • Large-cap U.S. only, roughly 200 stocks. No mid-caps, no small-caps, nothing overseas.
  • VUG charges a hair less for a similar broad-growth mandate. A tiny gap, but it is there. Distributions here arrive quarterly.

Full BUL profile⁠

Full SCHG profile⁠

BUL vs SCHG Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUL vs SCHG Cost

Overpaying BUL vs SCHG

$10,968

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUL 0.60%

    $11,817

  • SCHG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUL 0.60%
  • SCHG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530BUL $11,817SCHG $849

Year by year

YearBULSCHGOverpaying
10$1,076$73$1,003
20$4,116$288$3,828
30$11,817$849$10,968

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%BUL
  • 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

BUL 32nd cheapest of 35 funds

BUL vs SCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BUL 0.16%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Payout (12M)
BUL $0.10
SCHG $0.14
Last payment
BUL $0.0061
SCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
BUL Jun 4, 2026
SCHG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
BUL Jun 8, 2026
SCHG Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
BUL Twice a year
SCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

BULTwice a year · 26 paymentsAll BUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2019 $0.07; Sep 24, 2019 $0.07; Dec 24, 2019 $0.08; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.07; Sep 21, 2020 $0.08; Dec 21, 2020 $0.02; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.01; Mar 24, 2022 $0.05; Jun 23, 2022 $0.06; Sep 22, 2022 $0.05; Dec 22, 2022 $0.08; Mar 23, 2023 $0.20; Jun 22, 2023 $0.13; Sep 21, 2023 $0.22; Dec 27, 2023 $0.21; Mar 21, 2024 $0.06; Jun 27, 2024 $0.04; Sep 26, 2024 $0.03; Dec 27, 2024 $0.0086; Mar 6, 2025 $0.02; Jun 5, 2025 $0.01; Sep 4, 2025 $0.03; Dec 30, 2025 $0.09; Jun 4, 2026 $0.0061. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
SCHGQuarterly · 42 paymentsAll SCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 42 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.02; Jun 19, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Dec 18, 2017 $0.02; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2018 $0.02; Sep 25, 2018 $0.02; Dec 12, 2018 $0.03; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.03; Sep 25, 2019 $0.03; Dec 12, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.02; Dec 10, 2020 $0.02; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.02; Sep 22, 2021 $0.02; Dec 8, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0051; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.02; Sep 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 7, 2022 $0.02; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Jun 21, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.02; Dec 6, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0063; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 11, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.03; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.03; Dec 10, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

BUL vs SCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BUL
  • SCHG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SCHG −34.6% · Jan 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUL 14.0%, betterSCHG 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUL 1.13SCHG 1.16, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUL −27.9%, betterSCHG −34.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUL 0.82SCHG 1.20

BUL and SCHG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BULDvsSPYGA

    Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsSPYGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BULDvsILCGA

    Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsILCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BULDvsIMCGA

    Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsIMCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.