RWM ranks 4th and BZQ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
BZQ vs RWM
13.6%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 2876.7×the volume
10.4K30M
RWM +21.5pt
−32.8%−11.3%
BZQ vs RWM Performance
−84.3%−15.9%
- BZQ 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- BZQ $2M
- RWM $163M
- BZQ −35.0%
- RWM −10.1%, better
- BZQ 6.74%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- BZQ 1
- RWM 3
- BZQ 10.4K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- BZQ $21.30
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BZQ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | C41 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BZQ and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BZQC
RWMB
In short
BZQ The only US ETF built to deliver twice the inverse of Brazil's large-cap index, and it has done that job since 2009. A one-day instrument, priced at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
BZQ BZQ seeks daily results corresponding to two times the inverse performance of the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BZQ vs RWM Holdings
How BZQ and RWM differ
13.6%
Shared holdings make up 100% of BZQ and 13.6% of RWM.
Level by level
- Holdings13.6%
Sector
No Sector split for BZQ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BZQ.
Concentration
- BZQ100.0%
- RWM100.0%
- BZQ0
- RWM2
Asset class
- BZQ
- Equity
- RWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BZQ0
- In both0
- Only in RWM2
Only in BZQ
0 securities, 0.0% of BZQ by weight
Only in RWM
2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%
Weight gaps
BZQ and RWM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BZQ vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BZQ 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BZQ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%BZQ
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
BZQ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
BZQ vs RWM Dividends
- BZQ 6.74%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- BZQ $1.46
- RWM $0.48
- BZQ $0.30
- RWM $0.09
- BZQ Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- BZQ Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- BZQ Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
BZQ vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BZQ
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BZQ 44.6%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BZQ −0.54, betterRWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- BZQ −90.7%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BZQ −0.58RWM −1.23
BZQ and RWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
