DOG ranks 1st and RWM 4th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 6.3×the volume
4.77M30M
DOG +0.2pt
−10.9%−11.1%
DOG vs RWM Performance
−20.7%−18.3%
- DOG 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- RWM $163M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- RWM −10.2%
- DOG 3.15%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- DOG 3
- RWM 3
- DOG 4.77M sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- DOG $22.02
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A90 |
| Holdings | C43 | B63Higher |
| Durability | B69 | B69 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
RWMB
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs RWM Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- DOG $0.69
- RWM $0.48
- DOG $0.17
- RWM $0.09
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterRWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterRWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.