Skip to content
etf.net

CABZ vs FDIF

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF

CABZDCboe

Fidelity Disruptors ETF

FDIFBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FDIF −0.09pt a year

CABZ0.59%FDIF0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

FDIF 9.4×the volume

CABZ1.03KFDIF9.67K

CABZ vs FDIF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−21.6%CABZ+1.1%FDIF

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CABZ −21.6%. FDIF +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CABZ 0.59%
FDIF 0.50%, better
Fund size
CABZ $3M
FDIF $110M
1Y total return
CABZ No data
FDIF +8.0%
Yield (12M)
CABZ No data
FDIF 0.26%
Holdings
CABZ 30
FDIF 8
Avg volume (30D)
CABZ 1.03K sh
FDIF 9.67K sh, better
NAV per share
CABZ $17.20
FDIF $39.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CABZ: Cost 47, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 48, Durability 42. FDIF: Cost 65, Risk 85, Mission 88, Tradability 54, Holdings 21, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for CABZ, FDIF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCABZFDIF
Cost30% weightC47B65Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA88
Risk15% weightD27A85Higher
Tradability15% weightD29C54Higher
Holdings10% weightC48HigherF21
Durability5% weightC42A78Higher

Rank among Robotics & Automation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CABZ and FDIF are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Robotics & Automation⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FDIF ranks 4th and CABZ 13th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.

  1. Rank 4BBOTTThemes Humanoid Robotics ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 4BFDIFFidelity Disruptors ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 6BBULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 12CCBOTCorgi Robots & Humanoids ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 13DCABZRoundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 14DHUMNRoundhill Humanoid Robotics ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CABZDRoundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF

FDIFBFidelity Disruptors ETF

In short

CABZ Most robotics ETFs buy factory arms and humanoids. CABZ narrows the lens to driverless: an actively managed basket of about 30 robotaxi, autonomous-vehicle and enabling-tech names, launched in 2026.

FDIF Fidelity's disruption bet, aimed at companies remaking work through automation. It charges 0.50% where the typical robotics-theme fund asks 0.65%, and it has been running since 2020. The trade-off: it trades quietly.

Stated mandate

CABZ CABZ is an actively managed ETF investing in equity securities of companies involved in robotaxis, autonomous vehicles, and related technology.

FDIF The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in companies involved in disruptive automation.

Why people hold it

  • CABZ The mandate is robotaxis, autonomous vehicles and the technology underneath, not robotics broadly, so the driverless theme stays undiluted by factory automation.roundhillinvestments.com
  • Actively managed, so the manager can move between chipmakers, sensor suppliers and fleet operators as the autonomy race shifts, rather than waiting on an index committee.roundhillinvestments.com
  • At 0.59% a year it prices below the median robotics-and-automation ETF, which is uncommon for an active fund working a theme this narrow.
  • FDIF Charges 0.50% a year against a 0.65% median for its robotics and automation peer group. Cheap is rare in thematic land.
  • The portfolio hews closely to the prospectus mandate: companies involved in disruptive automation, pursued for long-term capital appreciation. Little theme drift.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its robotics and automation cohort, and its risk profile reads calmer than much of a theme built on moonshots.
  • Pays out quarterly, which is more cadence than most growth-themed funds bother with.

Worth knowing

  • CABZ Roughly 30 holdings in one narrow theme: news at a single company can move this fund more than a diversified tech basket.
  • It launched in January 2026, so there is no long record to judge, and newer, smaller funds tend to trade with wider bid/ask spreads.
  • Broader robotics exposure costs less elsewhere (BOTT at 0.35%, IBOT at 0.47%), though neither is built specifically around autonomous driving.
  • FDIF Thinly traded with a modest asset base. Spreads can run wider than the theme's household names, and size limits how much the fund gets talked about.
  • Portfolio construction is the weakest link in the package: a narrow, concentrated book where individual names carry real weight.
  • Fidelity's own FBOT sits in the same cohort at the same 0.50% fee, and BOTT undercuts both at 0.35%. Worth knowing what else shares the shelf.

Full CABZ profile⁠

Full FDIF profile⁠

CABZ vs FDIF Holdings

How CABZ and FDIF differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CABZ and 0.0% of FDIF.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector6 Sectors54.1%
  • Countryby domicile62.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CABZ and FDIF, widest gap first
SectorMore in CABZMore in FDIF
Consumer DiscretionaryCABZ +32.5 points
Health CareFDIF +20.3 points
TechnologyCABZ +13.3 points
FinancialsFDIF +12.2 points
IndustrialsFDIF +11.6 points
CommunicationFDIF +1.9 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CABZ and FDIF, widest gap first
CountryMore in CABZMore in FDIF
ChinaCABZ +28.6 points
United StatesFDIF +19.7 points
JapanFDIF +4.3 points
IsraelCABZ +3.8 points
Hong KongCABZ +3.2 points
TaiwanFDIF +3.2 points
CanadaFDIF +2.4 points
MalaysiaCABZ +2.2 points
Other countries (12)FDIF +8.1 points

Outside the US: CABZ 8% developed, 92% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CABZ53.6%
  • FDIF100.3%

Securities held

  • CABZ30
  • FDIF6

Asset class

CABZ
Equity
FDIF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CABZ30
  • In both0
  • Only in FDIF6

Only in CABZ

30 securities, 100% of CABZ by weight

  • Tesla Inc10.95%
  • Uber Technologies Inc5.99%
  • Alphabet Inc5.80%

Only in FDIF

6 securities, 100% of FDIF by weight

  • Fidelity Disruptive Technology21.86%
  • Fidelity Disruptive Medicine E21.22%
  • Fidelity Disruptive Automation19.64%

Weight gaps

CABZ and FDIF share no securities.

All 30 CABZ holdings⁠All 8 FDIF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CABZ vs FDIF Cost

Overpaying CABZ vs FDIF

$1,656

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CABZ 0.59%

    $11,635

  • FDIF 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CABZ 0.59%
  • FDIF 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CABZ $11,635FDIF $9,979

Year by year

YearCABZFDIFOverpaying
10$1,058$900$158
20$4,051$3,460$591
30$11,635$9,979$1,656

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%CABZ
  • 0.50%FDIF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
  • Median 0.54%

FDIF 7th cheapest of 18 funds

CABZ 10th cheapest of 18 funds

CABZ vs FDIF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CABZ No data
FDIF 0.26%
Payout (12M)
CABZ None
FDIF $0.10
Last payment
CABZ No data
FDIF $0.02
Ex-dividend
CABZ No data
FDIF Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
CABZ No data
FDIF Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
CABZ No data
FDIF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CABZAll CABZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FDIFQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll FDIF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 15, 2023 $0.06; Jun 21, 2024 $0.04; Sep 20, 2024 $0.03; Dec 20, 2024 $0.04; Mar 21, 2025 $0.03; Jun 20, 2025 $0.05; Sep 19, 2025 $0.02; Dec 19, 2025 $0.03; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.03; Sep 18, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0520232026YTD

CABZ vs FDIF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CABZ No dataFDIF 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CABZ No dataFDIF 1.04
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CABZ No dataFDIF −22.6%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CABZ 1.69FDIF 1.25

Popular comparisons

  • CABZDvsIBOTA

    Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDIFBvsIBOTA

    Fidelity Disruptors ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CABZDvsFBOTB

    Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDIFBvsFBOTB

    Fidelity Disruptors ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CABZDvsWDRNB

    Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDIFBvsWDRNB

    Fidelity Disruptors ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.