VYM ranks 2nd and CAFG 73rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
CAFG vs VYM
VYM −0.55pt a year
0.59%0.04%
VYM 61.4×the volume
18.6K1.14M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+20.9%+20.9%
CAFG vs VYM Performance
+34.0%+19.3%
- CAFG 0.59%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- CAFG $47M
- VYM $95.8B
- CAFG +34.0%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- CAFG 0.34%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- CAFG 100
- VYM 601
- CAFG 18.6K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- CAFG $34.02
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAFG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A86Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D35 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | C53Higher |
| Durability | F16 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. CAFG and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAFGC
VYMA
In short
CAFG Pacer's Cash Cows brand pointed down-market: roughly 100 US small caps screened for profitability, growth and momentum. A narrow, still-young sleeve of the multifactor shelf rather than another broad-market clone.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
CAFG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAFG vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAFG vs VYM Cost
Overpaying CAFG vs VYM
$10,786
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAFG 0.59%
$11,635
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAFG | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $73 | $985 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $288 | $3,763 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $849 | $10,786 |
- 0.59%CAFG
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
CAFG 81st cheapest of 99 funds
CAFG vs VYM Dividends
- CAFG 0.34%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- CAFG $0.12
- VYM $3.68
- CAFG $0.02
- VYM $0.89
- CAFG Sep 3, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- CAFG Sep 8, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- CAFG Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
CAFG vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAFG 17.7%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CAFG 0.91VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- CAFG −23.7%VYM −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CAFG 0.99VYM 0.75
CAFG and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



