VONV ranks 1st and VYM 2nd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
VONV vs VYM
VYM −0.02pt a year
0.06%0.04%
VYM 1.5×the volume
772K1.18M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.0%+12.0%
VONV vs VYM Performance
+73.8%+73.8%
- VONV 0.06%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- VONV $23.3B
- VYM $95.8B
- VONV +27.7%, better
- VYM +18.0%
- VONV 1.53%
- VYM 2.25%, better
- VONV 873
- VYM 601
- VONV 772K sh
- VYM 1.18M sh, better
- VONV $113.36
- VYM $162.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VONV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A85 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A93 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. VONV and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VONVA
VYMA
In short
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VONV vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VONV vs VYM Cost
Overpaying VONV vs VYM
$421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VONV | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $73 | $37 |
| 20 | $432 | $288 | $144 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $849 | $421 |
- 0.06%VONV
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
VONV vs VYM Dividends
- VONV 1.53%
- VYM 2.25%, better
- VONV $1.74
- VYM $3.68
- VONV $0.42
- VYM $0.89
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- VONV Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
VONV vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VONV
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VONV 12.4%VYM 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- VONV 1.18, betterVYM 1.12
- Worst fall
- VONV −18.9%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- VONV 0.85VYM 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


