SUB ranks 1st and CALI 11th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
CALI vs SUB
SUB −0.13pt a year
0.20%0.07%
SUB 4.7×the volume
186K880K
SUB +0.1pt
+3.1%+3.2%
CALI vs SUB Performance
+2.0%+2.3%
- CALI 0.20%
- SUB 0.07%, better
- CALI $701M
- SUB $13.4B
- CALI +2.0%
- SUB +2.3%, better
- CALI 2.47%
- SUB 2.57%, better
- CALI 263
- SUB 3149
- CALI 186K sh
- SUB 880K sh, better
- CALI $50.23
- SUB $105.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CALI | SUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C43 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A95Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. CALI and SUB are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CALIB
SUBA
In short
CALI California munis on a short leash. CALI is an actively run iShares portfolio of California-issued bonds maturing in five years or less, paying monthly income, at 0.20% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027 (0.25% gross).
SUB Munis, but only the near end of the curve. Since 2008 SUB has tracked an AMT-free index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing inside five years, paying tax-exempt income monthly with far less rate sensitivity than long-dated muni funds.
Stated mandate
CALI The fund actively manages a diversified portfolio of short-term municipal bonds issued in California, seeking tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
SUB The fund seeks to track an index of short-term, investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds maturing from one month through five years, providing tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CALI vs SUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CALI vs SUB Cost
Overpaying CALI vs SUB
$2,675
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CALI 0.20%
$4,155
SUB 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CALI | SUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $128 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $503 | $918 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,480 | $2,675 |
- 0.20%CALI
- 0.07%SUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
SUB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
CALI 12th cheapest of 27 funds
CALI vs SUB Dividends
- CALI 2.47%
- SUB 2.57%, better
- CALI $1.24
- SUB $2.73
- CALI $0.10
- SUB $0.23
- CALI Nov 2, 2026
- SUB Nov 2, 2026
- CALI Nov 5, 2026
- SUB Nov 5, 2026
- CALI Monthly
- SUB Monthly
Distribution history
CALI vs SUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CALI 1.3%, betterSUB 2.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CALI −1.03SUB −0.59, better
- Worst fall
- CALI −1.2%SUB −4.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CALI 0.05SUB 0.26
CALI and SUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


