EFIV ranks 2nd and CATH 25th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
CATH vs EFIV
EFIV −0.19pt a year
0.29%0.10%
EFIV 1.3×the volume
44.3K57.1K
EFIV +1.7pt
+10.6%+12.3%
CATH vs EFIV Performance
+65.2%+78.2%
- CATH 0.29%
- EFIV 0.10%, better
- CATH $1.36B
- EFIV $1.06B
- CATH +9.2%
- EFIV +12.5%, better
- CATH 0.76%
- EFIV 1.01%, better
- CATH 446
- EFIV 326
- CATH 44.3K sh
- EFIV 57.1K sh, better
- CATH $89.67
- EFIV $74.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATH | EFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C51 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | C49Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A78Higher | A71 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. CATH and EFIV are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATHB
EFIVA
In short
CATH Same S&P 500 neighborhood, screened through Catholic doctrine instead of a generic ESG rating. Global X has run this faith-based cut of the index since 2016.
EFIV A screened S&P 500 that still looks like one. EFIV trims to about 300 names on ESG criteria but holds industry-group weights close to the parent index, for 0.10% a year.
Stated mandate
CATH The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of the S&P 500® Catholic Values Index before fees and expenses.
EFIV The Fund seeks to track an index of securities selected using environmental, social, and governance sustainability criteria while retaining industry-group weights broadly similar to the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATH vs EFIV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATH vs EFIV Cost
Overpaying CATH vs EFIV
$3,846
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATH 0.29%
$5,952
EFIV 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATH | EFIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $183 | $344 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $717 | $1,327 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $2,106 | $3,846 |
- 0.29%CATH
- 0.10%EFIV, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
EFIV 7th cheapest of 47 funds
CATH 28th cheapest of 47 funds
CATH vs EFIV Dividends
- CATH 0.76%
- EFIV 1.01%, better
- CATH $0.68
- EFIV $0.74
- CATH $0.28
- EFIV $0.20
- CATH Jun 29, 2026
- EFIV Sep 21, 2026
- CATH Jul 2, 2026
- EFIV Sep 23, 2026
- CATH Twice a year
- EFIV Quarterly
Distribution history
CATH vs EFIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CATH
- EFIV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CATH 12.7%EFIV 12.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CATH 1.29EFIV 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- CATH −26.3%EFIV −24.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CATH 1.03EFIV 1.01
CATH and EFIV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
