ESGU ranks 4th and CATH 25th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
CATH vs ESGU
ESGU −0.14pt a year
0.29%0.15%
ESGU 8.8×the volume
44.3K389K
ESGU +0.2pt
+10.6%+10.8%
CATH vs ESGU Performance
+65.2%+67.1%
- CATH 0.29%
- ESGU 0.15%, better
- CATH $1.36B
- ESGU $17.8B
- CATH +9.2%
- ESGU +11.5%, better
- CATH 0.76%
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- CATH 446
- ESGU 271
- CATH 44.3K sh
- ESGU 389K sh, better
- CATH $89.67
- ESGU $165.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATH | ESGU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | B62 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | B59Higher |
| Durability | A78 | A95Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. CATH and ESGU are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATHB
ESGUA
In short
CATH Same S&P 500 neighborhood, screened through Catholic doctrine instead of a generic ESG rating. Global X has run this faith-based cut of the index since 2016.
ESGU Screening out companies is easy; keeping the market's shape while you do it is the hard part. ESGU's index optimizes toward stronger ESG characteristics while targeting risk and return similar to the broad MSCI USA Index.
Stated mandate
CATH The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of the S&P 500® Catholic Values Index before fees and expenses.
ESGU Seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap U.S. companies selected for favorable environmental, social and governance (ESG) characteristics while seeking risk/return similar to the MSCI USA Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATH vs ESGU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATH vs ESGU Cost
Overpaying CATH vs ESGU
$2,815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATH 0.29%
$5,952
ESGU 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATH | ESGU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $274 | $253 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $1,071 | $973 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $3,137 | $2,815 |
- 0.29%CATH
- 0.15%ESGU, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
ESGU 13th cheapest of 47 funds
CATH 28th cheapest of 47 funds
CATH vs ESGU Dividends
- CATH 0.76%
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- CATH $0.68
- ESGU $1.55
- CATH $0.28
- ESGU $0.38
- CATH Jun 29, 2026
- ESGU Sep 15, 2026
- CATH Jul 2, 2026
- ESGU Sep 18, 2026
- CATH Twice a year
- ESGU Quarterly
Distribution history
CATH vs ESGU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CATH
- ESGU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CATH 12.7%, betterESGU 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CATH 1.29ESGU 1.35, better
- Worst fall
- CATH −26.3%ESGU −26.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CATH 1.03ESGU 1.04
CATH and ESGU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
