Skip to content
etf.net

CAUG vs PSMO

Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

CAUGCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CAUG −0.19pt a year

CAUG0.30%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMO 17.8×the volume

CAUG410PSMO7.3K

CAUG vs PSMO Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%CAUG−0.3%PSMO

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CAUG −0.4%. PSMO −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.25%0.5%0.75%1%1.25%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CAUG 0.30%, better
PSMO 0.49%
Fund size
CAUG $1M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
CAUG No data
PSMO +10.0%
Holdings
CAUG 4
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
CAUG 410 sh
PSMO 7.3K sh, better
NAV per share
CAUG $25.21
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CAUG: Cost 83, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for CAUG, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCAUGPSMO
Cost30% weightA83HigherA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC48C54Higher
Tradability15% weightF14B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2B66Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CAUG and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and CAUG 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 30CGJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 41
  4. Rank 33CCAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 33CCJULCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CAUGCCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

CAUG No data

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

CAUG No data

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

CAUG No data

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

CAUG No data

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full CAUG profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

CAUG vs PSMO Holdings

As of

How CAUG and PSMO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CAUG and 0.0% of PSMO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in CAUG and PSMO, widest gap first
SectorMore in CAUGMore in PSMO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMO +1.2 points
TechnologyCAUG +1.0 points
Health CareCAUG +1.1 points
CommunicationPSMO +0.7 points
EnergyCAUG +0.3 points
FinancialsCAUG +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSMO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSMO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSMO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSMO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSMO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CAUG and PSMO, widest gap first
CountryMore in CAUGMore in PSMO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CAUG102.8%
  • PSMO104.3%

Securities held

  • CAUG3
  • PSMO2

Asset class

CAUG
Equity
PSMO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CAUG3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMO2

Only in CAUG

3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight

  • Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C80.17%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202716.73%
  • Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P4.74%

Only in PSMO

2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C98.58%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P4.59%

Weight gaps

CAUG and PSMO share no securities.

All CAUG holdings⁠All 6 PSMO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CAUG vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying PSMO vs CAUG

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CAUG 0.30%

    $6,149

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CAUG 0.30%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSMO $9,792CAUG $6,149

Year by year

YearCAUGPSMOOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
  • 0.49%PSMO
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

CAUG cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

CAUG vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CAUG None
PSMO None

Distribution history

CAUGAll CAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CAUG vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CAUG No dataPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CAUG No dataPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CAUG No dataPSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CAUG 0.00PSMO 0.41

CAUG and PSMO in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CAUGCvsPSMJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CAUGCvsPSMRB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CAUGCvsBUFCB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.