DFAC ranks 3rd and CCFE 119th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
CCFE vs DFAC
DFAC −0.79pt a year
0.96%0.17%
DFAC 993.6×the volume
2.02K2M
CCFE vs DFAC Performance
−5.8%+16.1%
- CCFE 0.96%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- CCFE $33M
- DFAC $87.7B
- CCFE −5.8%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- CCFE
- DFAC 0.88%
- CCFE 28
- DFAC 2553
- CCFE 2.02K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- CCFE $24.94
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCFE | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A94Higher |
| Mission | C46 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F6 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | A87Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. CCFE and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCFEF
DFACA
In short
CCFE A 20-to-30-stock mid-cap book from a boutique sub-adviser, wrapped in an ETF. Concentrated, bottom-up, and priced like the active management it is at 0.96%.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
CCFE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed equity portfolio, primarily consisting of mid-capitalization companies. The adviser applies bottom-up fundamental analysis and ranks companies using quality, valuation, and investment-thesis timing criteria.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCFE vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCFE vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying CCFE vs DFAC
$14,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCFE 0.96%
$18,034
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCFE | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $310 | $1,385 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $1,211 | $5,172 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $3,546 | $14,488 |
- 0.96%CCFE
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE 99th cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE vs DFAC Dividends
- CCFE
- DFAC 0.88%
- CCFE
- DFAC $0.39
- CCFE $0.005
- DFAC $0.10
- CCFE Dec 23, 2025
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- CCFE Dec 24, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- CCFE Irregular
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
CCFE vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCFE 24.1%DFAC 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCFE −0.002DFAC 1.32
- Worst fall
- CCFE −25.6%DFAC −23.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CCFE 0.99DFAC 0.99Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
CCFE and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.