DFAU ranks 2nd and CCFE 119th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
CCFE vs DFAU
DFAU −0.84pt a year
0.96%0.12%
DFAU 275.1×the volume
2.02K555K
CCFE vs DFAU Performance
−5.8%+13.2%
- CCFE 0.96%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- CCFE $33M
- DFAU $12.9B
- CCFE −5.8%
- DFAU +13.2%, better
- CCFE
- DFAU 0.90%
- CCFE 28
- DFAU 2165
- CCFE 2.02K sh
- DFAU 555K sh, better
- CCFE $24.94
- DFAU $52.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCFE | DFAU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A97Higher |
| Mission | C46 | A83Higher |
| Risk | F6 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | A84Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. CCFE and DFAU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCFEF
DFAUA
In short
CCFE A 20-to-30-stock mid-cap book from a boutique sub-adviser, wrapped in an ETF. Concentrated, bottom-up, and priced like the active management it is at 0.96%.
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
Stated mandate
CCFE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed equity portfolio, primarily consisting of mid-capitalization companies. The adviser applies bottom-up fundamental analysis and ranks companies using quality, valuation, and investment-thesis timing criteria.
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCFE vs DFAU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCFE vs DFAU Cost
Overpaying CCFE vs DFAU
$15,514
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCFE 0.96%
$18,034
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCFE | DFAU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $220 | $1,475 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $859 | $5,524 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $2,520 | $15,514 |
- 0.96%CCFE
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE 99th cheapest of 121 funds
CCFE vs DFAU Dividends
- CCFE
- DFAU 0.90%
- CCFE
- DFAU $0.47
- CCFE $0.005
- DFAU $0.12
- CCFE Dec 23, 2025
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- CCFE Dec 24, 2025
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- CCFE Irregular
- DFAU Quarterly
Distribution history
CCFE vs DFAU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCFE 24.1%DFAU 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCFE −0.002DFAU 1.38
- Worst fall
- CCFE −25.6%DFAU −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CCFE 0.99DFAU 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.