COTG ranks 3rd and CDNG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CDNG vs COTG
9.7%by weight
CDNG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
COTG 10.7×the volume
9.09K97.2K
CDNG vs COTG Performance
−9.7%+22.2%
- CDNG 0.75%, better
- COTG 0.77%
- CDNG $0
- COTG $9M
- CDNG
- COTG +16.3%
- CDNG 4
- COTG 4
- CDNG 9.09K sh
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- CDNG $8.95
- COTG $15.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CDNG | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B67 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D30 | B56Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CDNG and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CDNGC
COTGA
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CDNG vs COTG Holdings
How CDNG and COTG differ
9.7%
Shared holdings make up 12.4% of COTG and 9.7% of CDNG.
About this figure: CDNG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings9.7%
Sector
No Sector split for CDNG and COTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CDNGMore in COTG | Gap | CDNG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CDNG209.7%
- COTG212.3%
- CDNG1
- COTG1
Asset class
- CDNG
- Stocks
- COTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in CDNG0
- In both1
- Only in COTG0
Only in CDNG
0 securities, 0.0% of CDNG by weight
Only in COTG
0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CDNGMore in COTG | Gap | CDNG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | COTG +2.62 points | 9.74% | 12.36% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CDNG vs COTG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs CDNG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CDNG 0.75%
$14,482
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CDNG | COTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%CDNG, cheaper
- 0.77%COTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CDNG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
CDNG vs COTG Dividends
- CDNG None
- COTG None
Distribution history
CDNG vs COTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CDNG COTG 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CDNG COTG 0.12
- Worst fall
- CDNG COTG −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CDNG 3.75COTG −0.04
CDNG and COTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
