Skip to content

CERY vs CMDY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

CERYANYSE Arca

iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

CMDYANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CERY −0.01pt a year

CERY0.28%CMDY0.29%

Avg volume · 30D

CERY 2.4×the volume

CERY216KCMDY90.8K

CERY vs CMDY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+43.1%CERY+32.5%CMDY

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CERY +43.1%. CMDY +32.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CERY 0.28%, better
CMDY 0.29%
Fund size
CERY $1.27B
CMDY $743M
1Y total return
CERY +43.1%, better
CMDY +32.5%
Yield (12M)
CERY 3.59%
CMDY 9.96%, better
Holdings
CERY 12
CMDY 108
Avg volume (30D)
CERY 216K sh, better
CMDY 90.8K sh
NAV per share
CERY $39.89
CMDY $63.21
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CERY: Cost 84, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 64. CMDY: Cost 84, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 85, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for CERY, CMDY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCERYCMDY
Cost30% weightA84A84
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC52
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC47
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightB64B67Higher

Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CERY and CMDY are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Broad Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 21 funds
See all 21 ›

CERY ranks 1st and CMDY 2nd of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1ACERYState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACMDYiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3ACOMBGraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CERYAState Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

CMDYAiShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF

In short

CERY Broad commodity exposure without the K-1 envelope. CERY tracks Bloomberg's Enhanced Roll Yield index, a rules-based long-only basket held through synthetic futures, and charges 0.28% in a category where the typical fee is far higher.

CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.

Stated mandate

CERY The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, which represents diversified, long-only exposure to broad commodities through synthetic futures positions.

CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.

Why people hold it

  • CERY Costs 0.28% a year against a category norm nearer 0.68%. Fees bite hard in commodity futures funds, where there are no dividends to paper over the drag.
  • Tracks Bloomberg's Enhanced Roll Yield index: rules-based, long-only commodity exposure via synthetic futures. Roll mechanics come from index design, not a manager's call.ssga.com
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, so shareholders get a 1099 rather than the partnership K-1 that many commodity futures vehicles send.ssga.com
  • Sits with BCI and BCD at the low-fee end of the broad commodity futures group and rates among the strongest implementations in it.
  • CMDY The name is the strategy. Enhanced roll selection is baked into the index it tracks, so which futures contract to hold is a rule, not an afterthought.
  • 0.29% a year sits in the low-fee tier of broad commodity funds, next to BCI, CERY and BCD, and well under what the category typically charges.
  • One ticker, a broad basket of roughly 60 futures positions, run on a total-return basis that counts collateral income alongside commodity price moves.
  • Live since 2018 under the iShares roof, and one of the stronger implementations in its broad-basket commodity peer group.

Worth knowing

  • CERY Launched in 2024, so the record is short. The roll rules have not been tested across a full commodity cycle yet.
  • Long-only by design. There is no short side, so a broad commodity downturn passes straight through to the fund.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year. This is commodity price exposure, not a paycheck.
  • CMDY Moderately traded rather than a volume monster. Spreads can run wider than the mega-cap index funds, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • It is structured as a commodity pool, not a plain stock fund, so the tax paperwork and reporting work differently. Check the details before filing season.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the roll rule addresses futures mechanics only. Commodity prices still swing hard on their own.

Full CERY profile⁠

Full CMDY profile⁠

CERY vs CMDY Holdings

How CERY and CMDY differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CERY and 0.0% of CMDY.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for CERY.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for CERY.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CERY99.4%
  • CMDY28.2%

Securities held

  • CERY3
  • CMDY52

Asset class

CERY
Commodities
CMDY
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in CERY3
  • In both0
  • Only in CMDY52

Only in CERY

3 securities, 19.6% of CERY by weight

  • Treasury Bill 12/26 0.000009.20%
  • Treasury Bill 11/26 0.000007.22%
  • Trs USD Berytr3.18%

Only in CMDY

52 securities, 91.1% of CMDY by weight

  • Treasury Bill26.35%
  • Spire Inc 144A2.29%
  • Procter & Gamble Company (The) 144A2.15%

Weight gaps

CERY and CMDY share no securities.

All 9 CERY holdings⁠All 56 CMDY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CERY vs CMDY Cost

Overpaying CMDY vs CERY

$197

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CERY 0.28%

    $5,755

  • CMDY 0.29%

    $5,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CERY 0.28%
  • CMDY 0.29%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530CMDY $5,952CERY $5,755

Year by year

YearCERYCMDYOverpaying
10$509$527$18
20$1,976$2,044$68
30$5,755$5,952$197

Expense ratio

  • 0.28%CERY, cheaper
  • 0.29%CMDY
  • Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

CERY 3rd cheapest of 21 funds

CMDY 4th cheapest of 21 funds

CERY vs CMDY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CERY 3.59%
CMDY 9.96%, better
Payout (12M)
CERY $1.43
CMDY $6.29
Last payment
CERY $1.43
CMDY $6.29
Ex-dividend
CERY Dec 29, 2025
CMDY Dec 16, 2025
Paid on
CERY Dec 31, 2025
CMDY Dec 19, 2025
Frequency
CERY Annual
CMDY Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

CERYAnnual · 2 paymentsAll CERY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.14; Dec 29, 2025 $1.43. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD
CMDYAnnual · 8 paymentsAll CMDY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2018 $0.76; Dec 16, 2019 $1.00; Dec 14, 2020 $0.07; Dec 13, 2021 $7.96; Dec 13, 2022 $2.17; Dec 20, 2023 $2.40; Dec 17, 2024 $2.01; Dec 16, 2025 $6.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD

CERY vs CMDY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CERY 14.0%since Oct 2024CMDY 13.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CERY 1.41since Oct 2024CMDY 0.79
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CERY −14.3%since Sep 2024CMDY −26.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CERY 0.03CMDY 0.90

CERY and CMDY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CERYAvsCOMBA

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDYAvsCOMBA

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CERYAvsSDMFB

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDYAvsSDMFB

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CERYAvsBCDB

    State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDYAvsBCDB

    iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF · abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.