Skip to content

CGDG vs THOR

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

CGDGANYSE Arca

Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF

THORDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CGDG −0.32pt a year

CGDG0.47%THOR0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

CGDG 20.5×the volume

CGDG609KTHOR29.7K

CGDG vs THOR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.7%CGDG−1.0%THOR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CGDG +0.7%. THOR −1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−3%−2%2%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGDG 0.47%, better
THOR 0.79%
Fund size
CGDG $5.94B
THOR $46M
1Y total return
CGDG +12.8%
THOR No data
Yield (12M)
CGDG 2.26%
THOR No data
Holdings
CGDG 106
THOR 57
Avg volume (30D)
CGDG 609K sh, better
THOR 29.7K sh
NAV per share
CGDG $38.43
THOR $25.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGDG: Cost 79, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 83, Durability 82. THOR: Cost 16, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 39, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGDG, THOR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGDGTHOR
Cost30% weightA79HigherF16
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherB56
Holdings10% weightA83HigherD39
Durability5% weightA82HigherD38

Rank among Global Active Dividend Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGDG and THOR are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

CGDG ranks 1st and THOR 6th of 8 funds in the Global Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDGCapital Group Dividend Growers ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BDIVDAltrius Global Dividend ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 6DAMEIAmana Equity Income ETFScore 38
  4. Rank 6DTHORThornburg Premium Income Builder ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 8DICAPInfrastructure Capital Equity Income Fund ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGDGACapital Group Dividend Growers ETF

THORDThornburg Premium Income Builder ETF

In short

CGDG Capital Group's stock pickers hunt dividend growers anywhere on the map, developed markets and emerging ones alike, and charge less than the typical active global fund to do it. Roughly 100 names, income paid quarterly.

THOR No data

Stated mandate

CGDG CGDG seeks long-term total returns by investing in companies worldwide with the potential to provide attractive yield and dividend growth over the long term.

THOR No data

Why people hold it

  • CGDG Charges 0.47% a year, below the going rate for actively managed global equity ETFs. Cheap for a hand-picked portfolio, even if index products undercut it.
  • The mandate is genuinely worldwide, developed and emerging markets both in scope, and it screens for dividend growth potential rather than chasing the fattest current yield.
  • About 100 holdings, concentrated enough that individual picks carry real weight instead of getting diluted into an index-shaped blob. Distributions land quarterly.
  • Rates among the strongest funds in a crowded global active-equity group, and one of the few there built specifically around dividend growers.

THOR No data

Worth knowing

  • CGDG Launched in 2023, so there's no decade of results to judge this team's approach through a full market cycle.
  • Several highly rated global peers (GSWO, DFAW, AVGE) charge less. The extra fee here buys active selection, not broader coverage.
  • Emerging-market holdings bring currency swings and country-specific risk that a US-only dividend fund doesn't carry.

THOR No data

Full CGDG profile⁠

Full THOR profile⁠

CGDG vs THOR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGDG vs THOR Cost

Overpaying THOR vs CGDG

$5,756

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGDG 0.47%

    $9,418

  • THOR 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGDG 0.47%
  • THOR 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530THOR $15,174CGDG $9,418

Year by year

YearCGDGTHOROverpaying
10$847$1,405$558
20$3,261$5,331$2,070
30$9,418$15,174$5,756

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%CGDG, cheaper
  • 0.79%THOR
  • Middle half of Global Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.49%

CGDG 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

THOR 7th cheapest of 8 funds

CGDG vs THOR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGDG 2.26%
THOR No data
Payout (12M)
CGDG $0.87
THOR No data
Last payment
CGDG $0.16
THOR $0.11
Ex-dividend
CGDG Sep 30, 2026
THOR Sep 17, 2026
Paid on
CGDG Oct 1, 2026
THOR Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
CGDG Quarterly
THOR Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CGDGQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll CGDG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.11; Mar 28, 2024 $0.11; Jun 28, 2024 $0.23; Sep 30, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 31, 2025 $0.13; Jun 30, 2025 $0.23; Sep 30, 2025 $0.15; Dec 26, 2025 $0.18; Mar 31, 2026 $0.14; Jun 30, 2026 $0.39; Sep 30, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
THORIrregular · 1 paymentAll THOR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 17, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

CGDG vs THOR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGDG 8.9%THOR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGDG 1.51THOR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGDG −10.5%since Sep 2023THOR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGDG 0.51THOR 0.54

CGDG and THOR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGDGAvsDIVDB

    Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF · Altrius Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THORDvsDIVDB

    Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF · Altrius Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGDGAvsCVGDB

    Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF · CresAlta Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THORDvsCVGDB

    Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF · CresAlta Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGDGAvsDIVSB

    Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF · Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THORDvsDIVSB

    Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF · Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.