SPAB ranks 2nd and CGIB 100th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
CGIB vs SPAB
SPAB −0.42pt a year
0.45%0.03%
SPAB 25.1×the volume
124K3.11M
CGIB vs SPAB Performance
−0.4%−0.2%
- CGIB 0.45%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- CGIB $381M
- SPAB $10.4B
- CGIB −0.4%
- SPAB −0.2%, better
- CGIB 1.56%
- SPAB 4.20%, better
- CGIB 381
- SPAB 8697
- CGIB 124K sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- CGIB $25.11
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGIB | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B59Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C41 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B56 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. CGIB and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGIBC
SPABA
In short
CGIB Capital Group's active bond desk pointed overseas, with the currency layer hedged back to dollars. You get foreign bond selection without the euro and yen steering the outcome.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
CGIB The fund seeks a high level of current income while preserving capital, primarily through investments in bonds and other debt securities.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGIB vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGIB vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying CGIB vs SPAB
$8,403
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGIB 0.45%
$9,041
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGIB | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $55 | $757 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $216 | $2,912 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $638 | $8,403 |
- 0.45%CGIB
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
CGIB 84th cheapest of 114 funds
CGIB vs SPAB Dividends
- CGIB 1.56%
- SPAB 4.20%, better
- CGIB $0.39
- SPAB $1.04
- CGIB $0.03
- SPAB $0.09
- CGIB Oct 30, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- CGIB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- CGIB Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
CGIB vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGIB 3.1%SPAB 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGIB −0.28SPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- CGIB −2.7%SPAB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CGIB 0.08SPAB 1.00
CGIB and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

