VTEB ranks 1st and CGMU 12th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CGMU vs VTEB
VTEB −0.24pt a year
0.27%0.03%
VTEB 7.7×the volume
2.23M17.2M
CGMU +0.8pt
+5.2%+4.4%
CGMU vs VTEB Performance
+0.9%+0.1%
- CGMU 0.27%
- VTEB 0.03%, better
- CGMU $7.44B
- VTEB $52.4B
- CGMU +0.9%, better
- VTEB +0.1%
- CGMU 3.74%, better
- VTEB 3.47%
- CGMU 2789
- VTEB 11156
- CGMU 2.23M sh
- VTEB 17.2M sh, better
- CGMU $26.68
- VTEB $48.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGMU | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B63Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | B64 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | A85 |
| Durability | A77 | A95Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CGMU and VTEB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGMUA
VTEBA
In short
CGMU Capital Group's answer to the muni index giants: an actively run book of roughly 1,500 bonds, benchmarked to a blend that is deliberately 15% high yield. Federally tax-exempt income, paid monthly, for 0.27% a year.
VTEB Vanguard's national muni index fund, running since 2015 at three basis points, a tenth of what the typical muni ETF charges. Its benchmark screens for investment-grade bonds whose income is exempt from federal tax and the AMT.
Stated mandate
CGMU The fund seeks high current income exempt from regular federal income tax while preserving capital.
VTEB VTEB seeks to track an index measuring the investment-grade segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. It uses passive sampling to approximate the index and generally invests in federally tax-exempt municipal securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGMU vs VTEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGMU vs VTEB Cost
Overpaying CGMU vs VTEB
$4,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGMU 0.27%
$5,557
VTEB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGMU | VTEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $55 | $436 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $216 | $1,691 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $638 | $4,919 |
- 0.27%CGMU
- 0.03%VTEB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VTEB cheapest of 63 funds
CGMU 23rd cheapest of 63 funds
CGMU vs VTEB Dividends
- CGMU 3.74%, better
- VTEB 3.47%
- CGMU $1.00
- VTEB $1.70
- CGMU $0.08
- VTEB $0.14
- CGMU Oct 30, 2026
- VTEB Oct 1, 2026
- CGMU Pays Nov 2, 2026
- VTEB Oct 5, 2026
- CGMU Monthly
- VTEB Monthly
Distribution history
CGMU vs VTEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGMU 5.2%, betterVTEB 5.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGMU 0.15, betterVTEB −0.004
- Worst fall
- CGMU −5.6%VTEB −12.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CGMU 0.79VTEB 0.95
CGMU and VTEB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





