VCRM ranks 4th and CGMU 12th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CGMU vs VCRM
VCRM −0.15pt a year
0.27%0.12%
CGMU 3.3×the volume
2.23M679K
CGMU vs VCRM Performance
+0.9%+1.1%
- CGMU 0.27%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- CGMU $7.44B
- VCRM $2.2B
- CGMU +0.9%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- CGMU 3.74%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- CGMU 2789
- VCRM 2588
- CGMU 2.23M sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- CGMU $26.68
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGMU | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B63 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | A81 |
| Durability | A77Higher | A74 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CGMU and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGMUA
VCRMA
In short
CGMU Capital Group's answer to the muni index giants: an actively run book of roughly 1,500 bonds, benchmarked to a blend that is deliberately 15% high yield. Federally tax-exempt income, paid monthly, for 0.27% a year.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
CGMU The fund seeks high current income exempt from regular federal income tax while preserving capital.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGMU vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGMU vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying CGMU vs VCRM
$3,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGMU 0.27%
$5,557
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGMU | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $220 | $271 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $859 | $1,048 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $2,520 | $3,037 |
- 0.27%CGMU
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
CGMU 23rd cheapest of 63 funds
CGMU vs VCRM Dividends
- CGMU 3.74%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- CGMU $1.00
- VCRM $2.82
- CGMU $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- CGMU Oct 30, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- CGMU Pays Nov 2, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- CGMU Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
CGMU vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGMU 5.2%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGMU 0.15VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- CGMU −5.6%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CGMU 0.79VCRM 0.17
CGMU and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
