CGW ranks 4th and PIO 6th of 6 funds in the Water Category.
CGW vs PIO
CGW −0.17pt a year
0.58%0.75%
CGW 3.5×the volume
23.6K6.67K
CGW +1.2pt
+10.0%+8.8%
CGW vs PIO Performance
+18.1%+10.7%
- CGW 0.58%, better
- PIO 0.75%
- CGW $1.04B
- PIO $266M
- CGW +2.1%, better
- PIO −1.3%
- CGW 1.55%, better
- PIO 0.89%
- CGW 78
- PIO 45
- CGW 23.6K sh, better
- PIO 6.67K sh
- CGW $64.14
- PIO $43.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGW | PIO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A74Higher | B61 |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. CGW and PIO are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGWC
PIOD
In short
CGW Water treated as a global trade, not a US one. CGW has tracked the S&P Global Water Index since 2007, holding roughly 70 developed-market names across the utilities and equipment makers that keep water moving.
PIO Invesco's passport-carrying water fund: about 40 companies pulled from a Nasdaq global water index, running since 2007. The overseas counterpart to the US-focused water ETFs sitting next to it on Invesco's shelf.
Stated mandate
CGW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the S&P Global Water Index.
PIO The fund seeks to track the performance of the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index before fees and expenses and generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities represented by that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGW vs PIO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGW vs PIO Cost
Overpaying PIO vs CGW
$3,029
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGW 0.58%
$11,453
PIO 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGW | PIO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $1,336 | $295 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $5,078 | $1,092 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $14,482 | $3,029 |
- 0.58%CGW, cheaper
- 0.75%PIO
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
CGW 4th cheapest of 6 funds
PIO 6th cheapest of 6 funds
CGW vs PIO Dividends
- CGW 1.55%, better
- PIO 0.89%
- CGW $1.00
- PIO $0.39
- CGW $1.00
- PIO $0.31
- CGW Dec 22, 2025
- PIO Jun 22, 2026
- CGW Dec 26, 2025
- PIO Jun 26, 2026
- CGW Annual
- PIO Quarterly
Distribution history
CGW vs PIO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CGW
- PIO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGW 14.2%, betterPIO 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGW 0.70, betterPIO 0.52
- Worst fall
- CGW −32.7%, betterPIO −34.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CGW 0.78PIO 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.