TBLU ranks 2nd and PIO 6th of 6 funds in the Water Category.
PIO vs TBLU
TBLU −0.35pt a year
0.75%0.40%
PIO 3.7×the volume
6.67K1.8K
TBLU +1.2pt
+2.0%+3.2%
PIO vs TBLU Performance
+10.7%+17.1%
- PIO 0.75%
- TBLU 0.40%, better
- PIO $266M
- TBLU $55M
- PIO −1.3%
- TBLU −0.5%, better
- PIO 0.89%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- PIO 45
- TBLU 61
- PIO 6.67K sh, better
- TBLU 1.8K sh
- PIO $43.98
- TBLU $50.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PIO | TBLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A88Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D39 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | C49Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | C51Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B61Higher | C42 |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. PIO and TBLU are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PIOD
TBLUB
In short
PIO Invesco's passport-carrying water fund: about 40 companies pulled from a Nasdaq global water index, running since 2007. The overseas counterpart to the US-focused water ETFs sitting next to it on Invesco's shelf.
TBLU Tortoise didn't license a water benchmark, it built one. TBLU tracks its own global water index, ESG screened, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
PIO The fund seeks to track the performance of the Nasdaq OMX Global Water Index before fees and expenses and generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities represented by that index.
TBLU The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise Global Water Net Total Return Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PIO vs TBLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PIO vs TBLU Cost
Overpaying PIO vs TBLU
$6,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PIO 0.75%
$14,482
TBLU 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PIO | TBLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $723 | $613 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,793 | $2,285 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $8,090 | $6,392 |
- 0.75%PIO
- 0.40%TBLU, cheaper
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
TBLU cheapest of 6 funds
PIO 6th cheapest of 6 funds
PIO vs TBLU Dividends
- PIO 0.89%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- PIO $0.39
- TBLU $1.78
- PIO $0.31
- TBLU $0.50
- PIO Jun 22, 2026
- TBLU Jun 25, 2026
- PIO Jun 26, 2026
- TBLU Jun 26, 2026
- PIO Quarterly
- TBLU Twice a year
Distribution history
PIO vs TBLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PIO
- TBLU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PIO 16.3%TBLU 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PIO 0.52TBLU 0.62, better
- Worst fall
- PIO −34.3%, betterTBLU −35.4%
- Market sensitivity
- PIO 0.98TBLU 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.