Skip to content
etf.net

CGXU vs FHIL

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

CGXUBNYSE Arca

Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf

FHILCCboe

Overlap

8.8%by weight

Expense ratio

FHIL −0.06pt a year

CGXU0.54%FHIL0.48%

Avg volume · 30D

CGXU 1915.7×the volume

CGXU1MFHIL523

CGXU vs FHIL Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−6.2%CGXU+117.1%FHIL

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CGXU −6.2%. FHIL +117.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.200%300%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGXU 0.54%
FHIL 0.48%, better
Fund size
CGXU $6.59B
FHIL $4M
1Y total return
CGXU +7.8%
FHIL No data
Yield (12M)
CGXU 5.37%
FHIL No data
Holdings
CGXU 86
FHIL 82
Avg volume (30D)
CGXU 1M sh, better
FHIL 523 sh
NAV per share
CGXU $31.55
FHIL $23.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGXU: Cost 76, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 64, Durability 90. FHIL: Cost 91, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings 77, Durability 14.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGXU, FHIL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGXUFHIL
Cost30% weightA76A91Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB63HigherF14
Holdings10% weightB64A77Higher
Durability5% weightA90HigherF14

Rank among International Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGXU and FHIL are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Active Growth⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

CGXU ranks 1st and FHIL 10th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1BCGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BFFGXFidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 9CBKCIBNY Mellon Concentrated International ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 10CFHILFederated Hermes International Leaders EtfScore 40
  5. Rank 11DIGGYAB International Growth ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGXUBCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF

FHILCFederated Hermes International Leaders Etf

In short

CGXU Launched in 2022, CGXU runs international growth on a short leash: roughly 80 developed- and emerging-market stocks picked bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active rival in its lane.

FHIL No data

Stated mandate

CGXU The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in international equities, including companies in developed and emerging markets. It uses active, bottom-up stock selection to pursue companies with attractive growth opportunities.

FHIL No data

Why people hold it

  • CGXU At 0.54%, the fee sits under the median for its active international growth cohort and well under rivals like BKCI (0.75%).
  • About 80 stocks spanning developed and emerging markets: conviction-sized picks in one ticket, no separate EM sleeve to bolt on.capitalgroup.com
  • Rates among the strongest implementations in its ten-fund group of active international growth funds.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which counts when the underlying stocks sit in markets that close before New York opens.

FHIL No data

Worth knowing

  • CGXU Emerging markets ride alongside developed ones here, so currency moves and local politics are part of the package.capitalgroup.com
  • With roughly 80 names, each pick carries real weight; results track the managers' stock selection rather than broad index math.
  • Built around long-term capital growth, not cash flow: distributions land once or twice a year.

FHIL No data

Full CGXU profile⁠

Full FHIL profile⁠

CGXU vs FHIL Holdings

How CGXU and FHIL differ

Overlap by weight

8.8%

Shared holdings make up 14.1% of FHIL and 9.5% of CGXU.

Level by level

  • Holdings9 in both8.8%
  • Countryby domicile58.3%
  • Sector10 Sectors76.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CGXU and FHIL, widest gap first
SectorMore in CGXUMore in FHIL
CommunicationCGXU +9.9 points
FinancialsFHIL +8.7 points
Health CareFHIL +6.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCGXU +6.0 points
MaterialsCGXU +4.7 points
IndustrialsFHIL +4.4 points
TechnologyCGXU +2.9 points
UtilitiesFHIL +2.4 points
EnergyFHIL +1.0 points
Consumer StaplesFHIL +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CGXU and FHIL, widest gap first
CountryMore in CGXUMore in FHIL
United KingdomFHIL +15.1 points
CanadaCGXU +10.9 points
GermanyFHIL +9.2 points
South KoreaCGXU +9.0 points
FranceFHIL +6.7 points
TaiwanCGXU +5.1 points
BrazilCGXU +4.1 points
NetherlandsFHIL +2.8 points
Other countries (18)CGXU +4.5 points

Outside the US: CGXU 69% developed, 31% emerging. FHIL 97% developed, 3% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CGXU33.9%
  • FHIL26.9%

Securities held

  • CGXU77
  • FHIL80

Asset class

CGXU
Equity
FHIL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CGXU68
  • In both9
  • Only in FHIL71

Only in CGXU

68 securities, 87.4% of CGXU by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufac Common Stock TWD10.06.56%
  • Softbank Group Corp Common Stock4.63%
  • First Quantum Minerals Ltd Common Stock4.48%

Only in FHIL

71 securities, 87.0% of FHIL by weight

  • Federated Govt Obli Fd-Pr4.59%
  • Astrazeneca PLC2.92%
  • Dsv A/S2.69%

Weight gaps

All 9 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CGXU and FHIL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CGXUMore in FHIL
Siemens Energy AG Common StockFHIL +1.51 points
Sse PLC Common Stock GBP.5SSE.LFHIL +1.40 points
Unicredit Spa Common StockFHIL +0.77 points
Asml Holding NV Common Stock EUR.09FHIL +0.68 points
Sap SE Common StockFHIL +0.59 points
Keyence Corp Common StockFHIL +0.43 points
Engie Common Stock EUR1.0CGXU +0.36 points
Anglo American PLC Common StockAAL.LCGXU +0.23 points

All 81 CGXU holdings⁠All 77 FHIL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGXU vs FHIL Cost

Overpaying CGXU vs FHIL

$1,115

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGXU 0.54%

    $10,720

  • FHIL 0.48%

    $9,605

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGXU 0.54%
  • FHIL 0.48%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CGXU $10,720FHIL $9,605

Year by year

YearCGXUFHILOverpaying
10$971$865$106
20$3,724$3,328$396
30$10,720$9,605$1,115

Expense ratio

  • 0.54%CGXU
  • 0.48%FHIL, cheaper
  • Middle half of International Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FHIL 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

CGXU 3rd cheapest of 14 funds

CGXU vs FHIL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGXU 5.37%
FHIL No data
Payout (12M)
CGXU $1.69
FHIL None
Last payment
CGXU $0.41
FHIL No data
Ex-dividend
CGXU Jun 30, 2026
FHIL No data
Paid on
CGXU Jul 1, 2026
FHIL No data
Frequency
CGXU Twice a year
FHIL No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CGXUTwice a year · 9 paymentsAll CGXU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2022 $0.08; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Jun 29, 2023 $0.14; Dec 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 28, 2024 $0.15; Dec 26, 2024 $0.10; Jun 30, 2025 $0.29; Dec 26, 2025 $1.27; Jun 30, 2026 $0.41. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
FHILAll FHIL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CGXU vs FHIL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGXU 15.3%FHIL No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGXU 0.84FHIL No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGXU −25.6%since Feb 2022FHIL No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGXU 0.96FHIL 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • CGXUBvsFFGXB

    Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FHILCvsFFGXB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGXUBvsJIGB

    Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF · JPMorgan International Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FHILCvsJIGB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · JPMorgan International Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGXUBvsMTRAB

    Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF · Invesco International Growth Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FHILCvsMTRAB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · Invesco International Growth Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.