Skip to content
etf.net

FHIL vs MTRA

Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf

FHILCCboe

Invesco International Growth Focus ETF

MTRABCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

FHIL −0.06pt a year

FHIL0.48%MTRA0.54%

Avg volume · 30D

MTRA 15.2×the volume

FHIL523MTRA7.93K

FHIL vs MTRA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+117.1%FHIL−5.0%MTRA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FHIL +117.1%. MTRA −5.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.200%300%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FHIL 0.48%, better
MTRA 0.54%
Fund size
FHIL $4M
MTRA $127M
1Y total return
FHIL No data
MTRA −4.2%
Holdings
FHIL 82
MTRA 55
Avg volume (30D)
FHIL 523 sh
MTRA 7.93K sh, better
NAV per share
FHIL $23.65
MTRA $25.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHIL: Cost 91, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings 77, Durability 14. MTRA: Cost 76, Risk 31, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 39, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHIL, MTRA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHILMTRA
Cost30% weightA91HigherA76
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD38HigherD31
Tradability15% weightF14C52Higher
Holdings10% weightA77HigherD39
Durability5% weightF14A70Higher

Rank among International Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHIL and MTRA are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Active Growth⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

MTRA ranks 4th and FHIL 10th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1BCGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BFFGXFidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 3BJIGJPMorgan International Growth ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BMTRAInvesco International Growth Focus ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5BBGIABaillie Gifford International Alpha ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 9CBKCIBNY Mellon Concentrated International ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 10CFHILFederated Hermes International Leaders EtfScore 40
  8. Rank 11DIGGYAB International Growth ETFScore 32

FHIL vs MTRA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHIL vs MTRA Cost

Overpaying MTRA vs FHIL

$1,115

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHIL 0.48%

    $9,605

  • MTRA 0.54%

    $10,720

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHIL 0.48%
  • MTRA 0.54%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MTRA $10,720FHIL $9,605

Year by year

YearFHILMTRAOverpaying
10$865$971$106
20$3,328$3,724$396
30$9,605$10,720$1,115

Expense ratio

  • 0.48%FHIL, cheaper
  • 0.54%MTRA
  • Middle half of International Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FHIL 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

MTRA 3rd cheapest of 14 funds

FHIL vs MTRA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FHIL None
MTRA No data
Last payment
FHIL No data
MTRA $0.18
Ex-dividend
FHIL No data
MTRA Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FHIL No data
MTRA Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FHIL No data
MTRA Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

FHILAll FHIL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MTRAIrregular · 1 paymentAll MTRA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

FHIL vs MTRA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHIL No dataMTRA 13.3%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHIL No dataMTRA −0.23since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHIL No dataMTRA −15.8%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHIL 0.00MTRA 0.88

Popular comparisons

  • FHILCvsCGXUB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MTRABvsCGXUB

    Invesco International Growth Focus ETF · Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FHILCvsFFGXB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MTRABvsFFGXB

    Invesco International Growth Focus ETF · Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FHILCvsJIGB

    Federated Hermes International Leaders Etf · JPMorgan International Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MTRABvsJIGB

    Invesco International Growth Focus ETF · JPMorgan International Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.