CGXU ranks 1st and VNIE 11th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.
CGXU vs VNIE
CGXU −0.06pt a year
0.54%0.60%
CGXU 3515.5×the volume
1M285
CGXU vs VNIE Performance
+7.8%−1.8%
- CGXU 0.54%, better
- VNIE 0.60%
- CGXU $6.46B
- VNIE $9M
- CGXU +7.8%, better
- VNIE −1.8%
- CGXU 5.37%
- VNIE
- CGXU 88
- VNIE 49
- CGXU 1M sh, better
- VNIE 285 sh
- CGXU $31.55
- VNIE $24.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGXU | VNIE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | F24 |
| Mission | D30 | |
| Risk | C43Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A90Higher | D27 |
Rank among International Active Growth funds
Same Category. CGXU and VNIE are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGXUB
VNIED
In short
CGXU Launched in 2022, CGXU runs international growth on a short leash: roughly 80 developed- and emerging-market stocks picked bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active rival in its lane.
VNIE Vontobel has run the same quality-growth playbook out of its boutique since 1984. VNIE is the first time that approach shows up in an ETF: a concentrated book of non-US companies with pricing power, spanning developed and emerging markets.
Stated mandate
CGXU The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in international equities, including companies in developed and emerging markets. It uses active, bottom-up stock selection to pursue companies with attractive growth opportunities.
VNIE The Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGXU vs VNIE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGXU vs VNIE Cost
Overpaying VNIE vs CGXU
$1,097
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGXU 0.54%
$10,720
VNIE 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGXU | VNIE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $971 | $1,076 | $105 |
| 20 | $3,724 | $4,116 | $392 |
| 30 | $10,720 | $11,817 | $1,097 |
- 0.54%CGXU, cheaper
- 0.60%VNIE
- Middle half of International Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
CGXU 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
VNIE 11th cheapest of 14 funds
CGXU vs VNIE Dividends
- CGXU 5.37%
- VNIE
- CGXU $1.69
- VNIE
- CGXU $0.41
- VNIE $0.08
- CGXU Jun 30, 2026
- VNIE Dec 30, 2025
- CGXU Jul 1, 2026
- VNIE Jan 7, 2026
- CGXU Twice a year
- VNIE Irregular
Distribution history
CGXU vs VNIE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGXU 15.3%VNIE 14.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGXU 0.84VNIE −0.45
- Worst fall
- CGXU −25.6%VNIE −13.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CGXU 0.96VNIE 0.76
CGXU and VNIE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
