LQDW ranks 1st and CHPY 15th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
CHPY vs LQDW
LQDW −0.69pt a year
1.03%0.34%
CHPY 6.5×the volume
697K107K
CHPY vs LQDW Performance
+40.4%+1.8%
- CHPY 1.03%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- CHPY $1.25B
- LQDW $353M
- CHPY +40.4%, better
- LQDW +1.8%
- CHPY 50.57%, better
- LQDW 12.41%
- CHPY 58
- LQDW 3192
- CHPY 697K sh, better
- LQDW 107K sh
- CHPY $56.65
- LQDW $22.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHPY | LQDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D32 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | A72 | A100Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A82Higher |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. CHPY and LQDW are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHPYC
LQDWA
In short
CHPY Semiconductors, run for cash flow. CHPY holds a focused basket of US-listed chip stocks and sells options against them, turning one of the market's twitchiest sectors into option premiums and a monthly distribution schedule.
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
Stated mandate
CHPY The Fund seeks current income, cash distributions, and capital appreciation. It uses a focused portfolio of U.S.-listed semiconductor equities together with options strategies intended to generate premiums.
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHPY vs LQDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHPY vs LQDW Cost
Overpaying CHPY vs LQDW
$12,241
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHPY 1.03%
$19,173
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHPY | LQDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $616 | $1,198 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $2,386 | $4,421 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $6,932 | $12,241 |
- 1.03%CHPY
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
CHPY 20th cheapest of 25 funds
CHPY vs LQDW Dividends
- CHPY 50.57%, better
- LQDW 12.41%
- CHPY $27.65
- LQDW $2.83
- CHPY $0.46
- LQDW $0.38
- CHPY Oct 28, 2026
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- CHPY Oct 29, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- CHPY Weekly
- LQDW Monthly
Distribution history
CHPY vs LQDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHPY 40.7%LQDW 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CHPY 1.41LQDW 0.16
- Worst fall
- CHPY −28.7%LQDW −9.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CHPY 1.95LQDW 0.59
CHPY and LQDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


