LQDW ranks 1st and EFAA 2nd of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
EFAA vs LQDW
LQDW −0.05pt a year
0.39%0.34%
LQDW 1.1×the volume
93.6K107K
EFAA vs LQDW Performance
+11.8%+2.0%
- EFAA 0.39%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- EFAA $673M
- LQDW $353M
- EFAA +11.8%, better
- LQDW +2.0%
- EFAA 8.49%
- LQDW 12.38%, better
- EFAA 678
- LQDW 3192
- EFAA 93.6K sh
- LQDW 107K sh, better
- EFAA $54.22
- LQDW $22.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAA | LQDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | B61 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A82Higher |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. EFAA and LQDW are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAAA
LQDWA
In short
EFAA An MSCI EAFE index core with an option-income overlay running on only about half the portfolio, so the rest keeps its upside uncapped. The fee is 0.39% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, below the typical option-income fund.
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
Stated mandate
EFAA The fund seeks total return through current income and long-term capital growth while providing MSCI EAFE exposure through an active option-income overlay intended to generate income and help mitigate downside risk.
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAA vs LQDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAA vs LQDW Cost
Overpaying EFAA vs LQDW
$966
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAA 0.39%
$7,898
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAA | LQDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $616 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,386 | $339 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $6,932 | $966 |
- 0.39%EFAA
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
EFAA 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
EFAA vs LQDW Dividends
- EFAA 8.49%
- LQDW 12.38%, better
- EFAA $4.62
- LQDW $2.83
- EFAA $0.38
- LQDW $0.38
- EFAA Oct 19, 2026
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- EFAA Oct 23, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- EFAA Monthly
- LQDW Monthly
Distribution history
EFAA vs LQDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAA 8.4%LQDW 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAA 1.02LQDW 0.16
- Worst fall
- EFAA −12.0%LQDW −9.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAA 0.36LQDW 0.59
EFAA and LQDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
