CIBR ranks 4th and HACK 7th of 8 funds in the Cybersecurity Category.
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR −0.02pt a year
0.58%0.60%
CIBR 5.8×the volume
1.81M314K
CIBR +1.4pt
+18.5%+17.1%
CIBR vs HACK Performance
+91.3%+90.6%
- CIBR 0.58%, better
- HACK 0.60%
- CIBR $17.5B
- HACK $3.55B
- CIBR +31.4%
- HACK +42.2%, better
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- HACK 0.05%
- CIBR 46
- HACK 24
- CIBR 1.81M sh, better
- HACK 314K sh
- CIBR $100.98
- HACK $124.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIBR | HACK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B63 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | B55 | A70Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | A78 |
Rank among Cybersecurity funds
Same Category. CIBR and HACK are both graded against the same 8 Cybersecurity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIBRB
HACKC
In short
CIBR A 2015-vintage cybersecurity fund that grew into a multi-billion-dollar one. It tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with a tight basket of roughly 30 names, so every holding carries real weight.
HACK Cybersecurity by the rulebook: HACK has tracked the Indxx Cybersecurity Index since 2014 and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund in a now-crowded corner of thematic investing.
Stated mandate
CIBR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index through an indexing approach. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in the index's common stocks and depositary receipts.
HACK The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Cybersecurity Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIBR vs HACK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIBR vs HACK Cost
Overpaying HACK vs CIBR
$364
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIBR 0.58%
$11,453
HACK 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIBR | HACK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $1,076 | $35 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $4,116 | $130 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $11,817 | $364 |
- 0.58%CIBR, cheaper
- 0.60%HACK
- Middle half of Cybersecurity funds
- Median 0.46%
CIBR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
HACK 8th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR vs HACK Dividends
- CIBR 0.39%, better
- HACK 0.05%
- CIBR $0.39
- HACK $0.06
- CIBR $0.0029
- HACK $0.06
- CIBR Sep 24, 2026
- HACK Dec 30, 2025
- CIBR Sep 30, 2026
- HACK Dec 31, 2025
- CIBR Quarterly
- HACK Annual
Distribution history
CIBR vs HACK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CIBR
- HACK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIBR 23.8%HACK 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CIBR 1.09HACK 1.34, better
- Worst fall
- CIBR −33.9%, betterHACK −38.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CIBR 1.02HACK 0.83
CIBR and HACK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





