CIBR ranks 4th and WCBR 6th of 8 funds in the Cybersecurity Category.
CIBR vs WCBR
WCBR −0.13pt a year
0.58%0.45%
CIBR 20.1×the volume
1.81M90.3K
CIBR +3.2pt
+12.8%+9.6%
CIBR vs WCBR Performance
+82.7%+57.9%
- CIBR 0.58%
- WCBR 0.45%, better
- CIBR $17.5B
- WCBR $227M
- CIBR +25.8%
- WCBR +43.0%, better
- CIBR 0.41%, better
- WCBR 0.00%
- CIBR 46
- WCBR 31
- CIBR 1.81M sh, better
- WCBR 90.3K sh
- CIBR $100.98
- WCBR $48.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIBR | WCBR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | B58Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | B55 | B67Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | C51 |
Rank among Cybersecurity funds
Same Category. CIBR and WCBR are both graded against the same 8 Cybersecurity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIBRB
WCBRC
In short
CIBR A 2015-vintage cybersecurity fund that grew into a multi-billion-dollar one. It tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with a tight basket of roughly 30 names, so every holding carries real weight.
WCBR Cyber defense, distilled: a global basket of roughly 30 stocks with an ESG screen built into the index, at 0.45% a year. Concentration is the design choice, not an accident.
Stated mandate
CIBR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index through an indexing approach. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in the index's common stocks and depositary receipts.
WCBR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIBR vs WCBR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIBR vs WCBR Cost
Overpaying CIBR vs WCBR
$2,412
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIBR 0.58%
$11,453
WCBR 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIBR | WCBR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $812 | $229 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $3,128 | $858 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $9,041 | $2,412 |
- 0.58%CIBR
- 0.45%WCBR, cheaper
- Middle half of Cybersecurity funds
- Median 0.46%
WCBR 4th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
CIBR vs WCBR Dividends
- CIBR 0.41%, better
- WCBR 0.00%
- CIBR $0.39
- WCBR None
- CIBR $0.0029
- WCBR
- CIBR Sep 24, 2026
- WCBR
- CIBR Sep 30, 2026
- WCBR
- CIBR Quarterly
- WCBR
Distribution history
CIBR vs WCBR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CIBR
- WCBR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIBR 23.8%, betterWCBR 29.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIBR 1.09, betterWCBR 1.03
- Worst fall
- CIBR −33.9%, betterWCBR −52.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CIBR 1.02WCBR 1.08
CIBR and WCBR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





