CLIP ranks 2nd and EMNT 51st of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
CLIP vs EMNT
CLIP −0.17pt a year
0.07%0.24%
CLIP 18.3×the volume
296K16.1K
EMNT +0.4pt
+4.5%+4.9%
CLIP vs EMNT Performance
+3.7%+3.9%
- CLIP 0.07%, better
- EMNT 0.24%
- CLIP $2.35B
- EMNT $260M
- CLIP +3.7%
- EMNT +3.9%, better
- CLIP 3.72%
- EMNT 3.86%, better
- CLIP 27
- EMNT 253
- CLIP 296K sh, better
- EMNT 16.1K sh
- CLIP $100.14
- EMNT $98.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLIP | EMNT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F24 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | B63 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. CLIP and EMNT are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLIPA
EMNTB
In short
CLIP Treasury bills, one to three months out, at half the fee of the category's longtime giant. Global X launched CLIP in 2023 as the cheap challenger in the parking-lot corner of the bond market, and it has hugged its index tightly since.
EMNT PIMCO's ultra-short cash-parking playbook, run through an ESG screen. An active manager picking a few hundred short-dated bonds, paying income monthly, for a fee above most of the category.
Stated mandate
CLIP CLIP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index. It invests in U.S. government Treasury bills with remaining maturities from one month to under three months.
EMNT The Fund seeks maximum current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity, using PIMCO’s ESG investment strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLIP vs EMNT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLIP vs EMNT Cost
Overpaying EMNT vs CLIP
$3,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLIP 0.07%
$1,480
EMNT 0.24%
$4,959
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLIP | EMNT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $437 | $309 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,699 | $1,196 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $4,959 | $3,479 |
- 0.07%CLIP, cheaper
- 0.24%EMNT
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
CLIP 8th cheapest of 78 funds
EMNT 60th cheapest of 78 funds
CLIP vs EMNT Dividends
- CLIP 3.72%
- EMNT 3.86%, better
- CLIP $3.73
- EMNT $3.81
- CLIP $0.33
- EMNT $0.35
- CLIP Nov 2, 2026
- EMNT Nov 2, 2026
- CLIP Nov 5, 2026
- EMNT Nov 4, 2026
- CLIP Monthly
- EMNT Monthly
Distribution history
CLIP vs EMNT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLIP 0.2%, betterEMNT 0.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CLIP −0.51EMNT 1.01, better
- Worst fall
- CLIP −0.1%EMNT −1.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CLIP 0.01EMNT 0.02
CLIP and EMNT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
