CLIP ranks 2nd and SCUB 64th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
CLIP vs SCUB
0.0%by weight
CLIP −0.23pt a year
0.07%0.30%
CLIP 68.6×the volume
285K4.16K
CLIP vs SCUB Performance
+0.9%+0.6%
- CLIP 0.07%, better
- SCUB 0.30%
- CLIP $2.35B
- SCUB $29M
- CLIP +3.8%
- SCUB
- CLIP 4.06%
- SCUB
- CLIP 28
- SCUB 147
- CLIP 285K sh, better
- SCUB 4.16K sh
- CLIP $100.38
- SCUB $25.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLIP | SCUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | F8 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | F15 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. CLIP and SCUB are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLIPA
SCUBC
In short
CLIP Treasury bills, one to three months out, at half the fee of the category's longtime giant. Global X launched CLIP in 2023 as the cheap challenger in the parking-lot corner of the bond market, and it has hugged its index tightly since.
Stated mandate
CLIP CLIP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index. It invests in U.S. government Treasury bills with remaining maturities from one month to under three months.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLIP vs SCUB Holdings
How CLIP and SCUB differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CLIP and 0.0% of SCUB.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Country75.7%
Sector
No Sector split for CLIP and SCUB.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CLIPMore in SCUB | CLIP | SCUB |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CLIP +24.3 points | 100.0% | 75.7% |
| Cayman Islands | SCUB +20.0 points | 0.0% | 20.0% |
| United Kingdom | SCUB +3.2 points | 0.0% | 3.2% |
| Ireland | SCUB +0.7 points | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Bermuda | SCUB +0.4 points | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Outside the US: SCUB 16% developed, 84% emerging.
Concentration
- CLIP55.7%
- SCUB15.4%
- CLIP27
- SCUB146
Asset class
- CLIP
- Cash
- SCUB
- Fixed Income
Holdings
- Only in CLIP27
- In both0
- Only in SCUB146
Only in CLIP
27 securities, 100% of CLIP by weight
- B 12/03/26 (BW61LR4)7.07%
- B 12/24/26 (BSSBJ36)6.41%
- B 12/17/26 (BWRXMP4)6.38%
- B 12/01/26 (BRJJ0F1)6.17%
- B 01/07/27 (BTCLH46)5.72%
- B 12/31/26 (BNVVYP5)5.08%
- B 11/03/26 (BQGF9D6)5.03%
- B 12/10/26 (BXM7C47)4.97%
- B 01/21/27 (BV2FL73)4.85%
- B 11/10/26 (BXM1HG6)4.06%
- B 12/08/26 (BX7WM14)4.01%
- B 11/12/26 (BT9R101)3.99%
- B 11/05/26 (BNZJKH9)3.96%
- B 12/29/26 (BV8CZK9)3.87%
- B 11/19/26 (BVSVZ28)3.83%
- B 11/17/26 (BRCDQ07)3.55%
- B 11/24/26 (C04JZH3)3.35%
- B 11/27/26 (BVPJDQ5)3.31%
- B 12/22/26 (BVSPGV6)3.24%
- B 12/15/26 (BV88875)3.09%
- B 01/26/27 (C0FRT41)2.96%
- B 01/28/27 (BXW2BR8)2.96%
- B 01/19/27 (C0C06G4)2.11%
- B 01/14/27 (BTMT4S3)2.04%
- B 01/05/27 (BQZCL87)1.06%
- B 02/02/27 (C0JZ264)1.06%
- B 02/09/27 (C05DTR2)1.05%
Only in SCUB
146 securities, 99.9% of SCUB by weight
- B 12/15/262.58%
- Jef 4.85 01/15/271.73%
- BANK5 2023-5YR1 A31.61%
- Receivables/Payables1.51%
- Mvwot 2023-1A A1.40%
- Cfii 2024-1A B1.38%
- Sidc 2023-3A A21.35%
- Vdc 2020-2A A21.34%
- Comm 2017-COR2 A31.30%
- Ladar 2024-3A B1.26%
- Ubscm 2017-C4 A31.24%
- Tcn 2025-SFR1 A1.24%
- Bcc 2021-4A A1RR1.21%
- Hwire 2021-1 A21.16%
- Babsn 2021-2A A1R1.12%
- Jnppk 2023-1A Arr1.12%
- Agl 2021-16A Ar1.12%
- Aesop 2023-5A A1.09%
- Hertz 2022-2A A1.02%
- Pfsfc 2024-D B1.02%
- Bank 2017-BNK7 A51.02%
- Rram 2021-17A A1AR1.01%
- Bmark 2023-V2 A30.98%
- Wfcm 2017-C40 A30.98%
- Magne 2019-21A AR20.96%
- Mdpk 2020-45A Arr0.93%
- Prog 2022-SFR5 A0.93%
- Sclp 2025-4 A0.90%
- Jpm Float 10/22/280.90%
- Navsl 2020-CA A2A0.89%
- Bmo 2024-5C3 As0.87%
- Trnts 2021-16AR A1R20.87%
- Fg 5 7/8 06/10/270.87%
- Gsar 2026-4A A20.87%
- Nfmot 2025-2A A10.87%
- Hesm 5 7/8 03/01/280.86%
- Magne 2021-30A Ar0.86%
- Babsn 2019-4A Ar0.86%
- Pipk 2020-5A A1R0.86%
- Zais 2022-18A A1R0.86%
- Mdpk 2021-49A Ar0.86%
- Drslf 2017-53A Br0.86%
- Cof 4.927 05/10/280.86%
- Chcoch 5 1/8 06/30/270.86%
- Blast 2026-3 A20.86%
- Wlake 2026-3A A2A0.86%
- Cfg 4.575 08/09/280.86%
- Hnor 2026-A A0.86%
- Ally 4 3/4 06/09/270.86%
- Cslau 3.85 04/27/270.86%
Weight gaps
CLIP and SCUB share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLIP vs SCUB Cost
Overpaying SCUB vs CLIP
$4,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLIP 0.07%
$1,480
SCUB 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLIP | SCUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $545 | $417 |
| 20 | $503 | $2,113 | $1,610 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $6,149 | $4,669 |
- 0.07%CLIP, cheaper
- 0.30%SCUB
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
CLIP 8th cheapest of 78 funds
SCUB 69th cheapest of 78 funds
CLIP vs SCUB Dividends
- CLIP 4.06%
- SCUB
- CLIP $4.06
- SCUB
- CLIP $0.33
- SCUB $0.09
- CLIP Nov 2, 2026
- SCUB Oct 1, 2026
- CLIP Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCUB Oct 5, 2026
- CLIP Monthly
- SCUB Monthly
Distribution history
CLIP vs SCUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLIP 0.2%SCUB
- Return per unit of risk
- CLIP −0.51SCUB
- Worst fall
- CLIP −0.1%SCUB
- Market sensitivity
- CLIP 0.01SCUB 0.02
CLIP and SCUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
