CLIP ranks 2nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
CLIP vs XCSH
0.0%by weight
CLIP −0.11pt a year
0.07%0.18%
CLIP 90.5×the volume
285K3.15K
CLIP vs XCSH Performance
+0.4%+0.4%
- CLIP 0.07%, better
- XCSH 0.18%
- CLIP $2.35B
- XCSH $12M
- CLIP +3.8%
- XCSH
- CLIP 3.72%
- XCSH
- CLIP 26
- XCSH 4
- CLIP 285K sh, better
- XCSH 3.15K sh
- CLIP $100.38
- XCSH $100.73
ETF.net Grade
- —XCSHNot yet graded
| Pillar | CLIP | XCSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C47 | |
| Tradability | A80 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B68 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Our read on each fund
CLIPA
XCSH—
In short
CLIP Treasury bills, one to three months out, at half the fee of the category's longtime giant. Global X launched CLIP in 2023 as the cheap challenger in the parking-lot corner of the bond market, and it has hugged its index tightly since.
Stated mandate
CLIP CLIP seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index. It invests in U.S. government Treasury bills with remaining maturities from one month to under three months.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLIP vs XCSH Holdings
How CLIP and XCSH differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CLIP and 0.0% of XCSH.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CLIP and XCSH.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CLIPMore in XCSH | CLIP | XCSH |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CLIP +0.5 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | XCSH +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | XCSH +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | XCSH +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CLIP63.8%
- XCSH100.0%
- CLIP26
- XCSH3
Asset class
- CLIP
- Cash
- XCSH
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CLIP26
- In both0
- Only in XCSH3
Only in CLIP
26 securities, 100% of CLIP by weight
- B 11/19/26 (BVSVZ28)8.23%
- B 11/27/26 (BVPJDQ5)7.53%
- B 11/12/26 (BT9R101)7.40%
- B 12/03/26 (BW61LR4)7.04%
- B 11/05/26 (BNZJKH9)6.95%
- B 12/17/26 (BWRXMP4)6.37%
- B 11/03/26 (BQGF9D6)5.67%
- B 12/01/26 (BRJJ0F1)5.11%
- B 12/31/26 (BNVVYP5)5.09%
- B 11/24/26 (C04JZH3)4.42%
- B 11/17/26 (BRCDQ07)4.31%
- B 12/24/26 (BSSBJ36)4.26%
- B 11/10/26 (BXM1HG6)4.03%
- B 12/08/26 (BX7WM14)4.01%
- Other Payable & Receivables3.27%
- B 10/20/26 (BWM2X64)3.04%
- B 10/29/26 (BV3PBJ4)2.99%
- B 10/22/26 (BW5RJY6)2.96%
- B 10/27/26 (BVSRRW0)2.55%
- B 01/07/27 (BTCLH46)2.54%
- B 12/10/26 (BXM7C47)2.38%
- B 10/15/26 (BTWQYX9)2.03%
- B 01/05/27 (BQZCL87)1.06%
- B 12/15/26 (BV88875)0.02%
- B 12/22/26 (BVSPGV6)0.02%
- B 12/29/26 (BV8CZK9)0.02%
Only in XCSH
3 securities, 100% of XCSH by weight
- Spy 01/15/2027 100.01 C67.46%
- Spy 01/15/2027 1100.01 P32.45%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.09%
Weight gaps
CLIP and XCSH share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLIP vs XCSH Cost
Overpaying XCSH vs CLIP
$2,269
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLIP 0.07%
$1,480
XCSH 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLIP | XCSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $328 | $200 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,281 | $778 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $3,749 | $2,269 |
- 0.07%CLIP, cheaper
- 0.18%XCSH
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
CLIP 8th cheapest of 78 funds
XCSH 36th cheapest of 78 funds
CLIP vs XCSH Dividends
- CLIP 3.72%
- XCSH
- CLIP $3.74
- XCSH None
- CLIP $0.31
- XCSH
- CLIP Oct 1, 2026
- XCSH
- CLIP Oct 6, 2026
- XCSH
- CLIP Monthly
- XCSH
Distribution history
CLIP vs XCSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLIP 0.2%XCSH
- Return per unit of risk
- CLIP −0.51XCSH
- Worst fall
- CLIP −0.1%XCSH
- Market sensitivity
- CLIP 0.01XCSH 0.00
CLIP and XCSH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
