ICSH ranks 1st and CMBO 67th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
CMBO vs ICSH
ICSH −0.07pt a year
0.15%0.08%
ICSH 2942.3×the volume
5591.64M
CMBO vs ICSH Performance
+3.3%+2.8%
- CMBO 0.15%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- CMBO $3M
- ICSH $8.97B
- CMBO
- ICSH +3.6%
- CMBO
- ICSH 4.13%
- CMBO 3
- ICSH 408
- CMBO 559 sh
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- CMBO $102.13
- ICSH $50.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMBO | ICSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | F18 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | A95Higher |
| Durability | F8 | A90Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. CMBO and ICSH are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMBOC
ICSHA
In short
CMBO Most bond funds pick a duration and live with it. CMBO is actively run to roam across fixed-income sectors, maturities and credit quality using bond ETFs and rate derivatives, at a 0.15% fee.
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
CMBO The Fund seeks total return through an actively managed strategy focused primarily on fixed-income ETFs and derivatives referencing fixed-income instruments or indices. Its exposure may span multiple fixed-income sectors, maturities, durations, and quality levels.
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMBO vs ICSH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMBO vs ICSH Cost
Overpaying CMBO vs ICSH
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMBO 0.15%
$3,137
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMBO | ICSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $147 | $127 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $575 | $496 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,689 | $1,448 |
- 0.15%CMBO
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
CMBO 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
CMBO vs ICSH Dividends
- CMBO
- ICSH 4.13%
- CMBO
- ICSH $2.08
- CMBO $1.97
- ICSH $0.17
- CMBO Sep 16, 2026
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- CMBO Sep 17, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- CMBO Irregular
- ICSH Monthly
Distribution history
CMBO vs ICSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMBO ICSH 0.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMBO ICSH 0.87
- Worst fall
- CMBO ICSH −0.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CMBO −0.002ICSH 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.